Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique

被引:27
|
作者
Valiris, George [1 ]
Chytas, Panagiotis [1 ]
Glykas, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aegean, Dept Business Adm, Chios, Greece
[2] Univ Aegean, Dept Financial & Management Engn, Chios, Greece
关键词
Balanced scorecard; Performance measures; Management activities; Financial institutions; Greece;
D O I
10.1108/14678040510636720
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this article is to address the measure selection problem and to propose the use of a multi-criteria approach to address the problem more effectively. The main objective of this research is to propose a methodology (not a new performance measurement framework) that will support existing measurement framework(s) during the process of performance measurement systems' design, implementation and use, and to advance the decision-making process. Design/methodology/approach - Conforming to the most favoured approach, the balanced scorecard is adopted to illustrate the proposed methodology. This paper briefly illustrates the application of the proposed methodology. This illustration is based on a real case study from a Greek financial institution, which has considered the proposed methodology in order to select appropriate measures. The paper begins with a brief literature review on the balanced scorecard, the theory of MCDM and smart technique. In section three the proposed methodology is presented and each of the stages involved. The paper then illustrates the proposed methodology. Findings - The greatest significance of the methodology suggested here is that it provides a structure to guide decision makers through the process of measure selection. Criteria must be identified and considered systematically, as must alternatives (i.e. measures). Originality/value - While the smart was chosen to select appropriate measures for the balanced scorecard, the basic approach used in formulating the problem serves also as a framework for the application of other multi-criteria approaches to this problem as well as to other performance measurement frameworks. Ultimately, better quality decisions will result; both as a consequence of the support provided by the multi-criteria tools and as a result of a structure that will help the decision makers to better understand the issues associated with the problem involved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 171
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simple multi-attribute rating technique for renewable energy deployment decisions (SMART REDD)
    Taylor, James M., Jr.
    Love, Betty N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2014, 11 (03): : 227 - 232
  • [2] Contractor Selection in the Housing Sector Using the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique
    Demirci, Gulcan
    Ayar, Bunyamin
    Kivrak, Serkan
    Gokhan, Arslan
    [J]. CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2672 - 2677
  • [3] Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support
    Siregar, Dodi
    Arisandi, Diki
    Usman, Ari
    Irwan, Dedy
    Rahim, Robbi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICONICT), 2017, 930
  • [4] Comparison of simple multi-attribute rating technique and fuzzy linguistic methods in multiattribute decision making
    Buchal, RO
    Mechefske, CK
    [J]. CONDITION MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, : 185 - 192
  • [5] Group Decision Making in Evaluation and Ranking of Students by Extended Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique
    Borissova, Daniela
    Keremedchiev, Delyan
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 19 (03) : 45 - 56
  • [6] The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking
    Barron, FH
    Barrett, BE
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1996, 93 (1-3) : 23 - 36
  • [7] A multi-attribute approach to ranking departments based on performance: a balanced scorecard pilot study
    Senel, Ugur Tahsin
    Rouyendegh, Babak Daneshvar
    Demir, Sercan
    [J]. COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 8 (05) : 4177 - 4185
  • [8] A multi-attribute approach to ranking departments based on performance: a balanced scorecard pilot study
    Uğur Tahsin Şenel
    Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh
    Sercan Demir
    [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2022, 8 : 4177 - 4185
  • [9] Quantification of Balanced Scorecard using crisp and fuzzy multi attribute decision making: Application to Banking
    Shivakumar, U.
    Ravi, V.
    Venkateswaran, T. R.
    [J]. 2013 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETET 2013), 2013, : 164 - 170
  • [10] Thesis topic recommendation using simple multi attribute rating technique
    Slamet, C.
    Maliki, F. M.
    Syaripudin, U.
    Amin, A. S.
    Ramdhani, M. A.
    [J]. 4TH ANNUAL APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, 2019, 1402