The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking

被引:102
|
作者
Barron, FH
Barrett, BE
机构
[1] Dept. of Mgmt. Sci. and Statistics, University of Alabama, Box 870226, Tuscaloosa
关键词
management decision making; additive value model; multiattribute evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A key component in the development of an additive multiattribute value model for selecting the best alternative is obtaining the attribute weights. In this paper, we assume the decision maker's weight information set consists of ranked swing weights, that is, a ranking of the importance of the attribute ranges, and in this context use 'surrogate weights' derived from this ranking. The particular surrogate weights are called ROC, for rank order centroid weights. The paper presents three sets of results: (1) a summary of the efficacy of using ROC weights to select a best alternative; (2) an extension of the method of analysis underlying the efficacy studies to assess the applicability of ROC weights for the analyst's specific value matrix; (3) methods for sensitivity analyses of a specific value matrix. A comprehensive example illustrates all analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 36
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Group Decision Making in Evaluation and Ranking of Students by Extended Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique
    Borissova, Daniela
    Keremedchiev, Delyan
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 19 (03) : 45 - 56
  • [2] Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support
    Siregar, Dodi
    Arisandi, Diki
    Usman, Ari
    Irwan, Dedy
    Rahim, Robbi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICONICT), 2017, 930
  • [3] Information System of Performance Assesment on Startup Business using Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER)
    Tangkesalu, Alen Adriyanti
    Suseno, Jatmiko Endro
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (ICENIS 2018), 2018, 73
  • [4] Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique
    Valiris, George
    Chytas, Panagiotis
    Glykas, Michael
    [J]. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND METRICS, 2005, 6 (03) : 159 - 171
  • [5] Contractor Selection in the Housing Sector Using the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique
    Demirci, Gulcan
    Ayar, Bunyamin
    Kivrak, Serkan
    Gokhan, Arslan
    [J]. CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2672 - 2677
  • [6] Simple multi-attribute rating technique for renewable energy deployment decisions (SMART REDD)
    Taylor, James M., Jr.
    Love, Betty N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2014, 11 (03): : 227 - 232
  • [7] Comparison of simple multi-attribute rating technique and fuzzy linguistic methods in multiattribute decision making
    Buchal, RO
    Mechefske, CK
    [J]. CONDITION MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, : 185 - 192
  • [8] A Multi-Attribute Ranking Solutions Confirmation Procedure
    Domingos Moreira Cardoso
    Jorge Freire de Sousa
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2005, 138 : 127 - 141
  • [9] A multi-attribute ranking method for bridge management
    Abu Dabous, Saleh
    Alkass, Sabah
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (03) : 282 - +
  • [10] A multi-attribute ranking solutions confirmation procedure
    Cardoso, DM
    De Sousa, JF
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 138 (01) : 127 - 141