Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development

被引:125
|
作者
Bock, Bettina B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6707 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2012年 / 114卷 / 02期
关键词
social innovation; responsible innovation; critical innovation; rural development; sustainable agriculture; rural governance;
D O I
10.7896/j.1209
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Social innovation is often appointed as an essential part of agricultural and rural innovation. Everybody seems to agree that social innovation is important but what exactly is meant by the term remains often unclear. This paper aims at clarifying the meaning and significance of the concept by going back to its root in innovation science and policy. It appoints three main interpretations of social innovation, referring to the social mechanism of innovation, the social responsibility of innovation and the need for innovating society. Studying its application in the field of agriculture and rural development reveals that social innovation is rarely referred to when agriculture as a singular economic activity is concerned, but prominently present in discussions about rural development. Here social innovation may be referred to when identifying society's need for more sustainable production methods, the necessity for collaboration and social learning, and the scope of change needed for revitalising (rural) society. Often, however, social innovation is presented as a tangle of interdependent processes and beneficial outcomes. Its fuzziness contributes to its discursive power in discussions about agricultural politics and the significance of sustainability,but also hides the valued-loadedness of social innovation. As a result its critical potential becomes neutralised. For gaining more insight in how to more effectively support social innovation, it is important to disentangle the social innovation jumble, to unravel the diverse interrelations and to explore and monitor its functioning and contribution to processes of social change and renewal.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment
    Tudi, Muyesaier
    Ruan, Huada Daniel
    Wang, Li
    Lyu, Jia
    Sadler, Ross
    Connell, Des
    Chu, Cordia
    Dung Tri Phung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (03) : 1 - 24
  • [42] The concept of ecological agriculture and its suitability for promoting sustainable rural development
    Lopez, Xose A. Armesto
    BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION DE GEOGRAFOS ESPANOLES, 2007, (43): : 155 - 172
  • [43] The concept of ecological agriculture and its suitability to foment rural sustainable development
    Armesto Lopez, Xose A.
    BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION DE GEOGRAFOS ESPANOLES, 2007, (43): : 387 - 389
  • [44] EVOLUTION OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN ROMANIA AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT
    Pascu, Andreea Daniela
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 13 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [45] COLLECTIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AGRICULTURE AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE
    Panagiota, Sergaki
    Nastis, Stefanos A.
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE JOVAN CVIJIC SASA, 2011, 61 (02): : 109 - 128
  • [46] THE INDIVIDUAL SECTOR OF AGRICULTURE IN MOLDOVA AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS
    Cimpoies, Liliana
    Semenova, Elena
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017: BIOECONOMY CHALLENGES, 2017, : 955 - 959
  • [49] Social Innovation in Rural Regions: Older Adults and Creative Community Development*
    Noack, Anika
    Federwisch, Tobias
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 85 (04) : 1021 - 1044
  • [50] Social Innovation and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of a Brazilian Agroecology Network
    Rover, Oscar Jose
    de Gennaro, Bernardo Corrado
    Roselli, Luigi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)