机构:
Int Islamic Univ Malaysia IIUM, Kulliyyah Islamic Revealed Knowledge & Human Sci, Dept Usul al Din & Comparat Relig, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaInt Islamic Univ Malaysia IIUM, Kulliyyah Islamic Revealed Knowledge & Human Sci, Dept Usul al Din & Comparat Relig, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Thoha, Anis Malik
[1
]
机构:
[1] Int Islamic Univ Malaysia IIUM, Kulliyyah Islamic Revealed Knowledge & Human Sci, Dept Usul al Din & Comparat Relig, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Religionswissenschaft;
epoche;
objectivity;
al-'adl;
Muslim scholarship;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号:
010107 ;
摘要:
The concern for and the debate on "objectivity" in the scientific study of religions led scholars to advocate two major approaches known as "History of Religion" and "Phenomenology of Religion." Both approaches are claimed to be "descriptive" and "value-free" as they stringently enforce the principle of epoche or distanciation to ensure objectivity. However, there are scholars who argue that objectivity (be it "descriptive" or "value-free") is ontologically questionable and epistemologically impossible. It is a self-defeating concept and a myth. They argue that objectivity is principally and directly concerned with "the object" under investigation regardless of the types of approach used.