Mobilizing Finance for REDD+ After Paris

被引:4
|
作者
Streck, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] Climate Focus, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
climate finance; REDD+; European Union; Paris Agreement;
D O I
10.1163/18760104-01302003
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In December 2015, more than 190 countries endorsed the Paris Agreement, an international framework to tackle climate change that aims to hold global temperatures well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. This paper evaluates options for the European Union (EU) and its Member States to support the implementation of the Paris Agreement through financing developing country efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation (REDD+). A diverse range of options exists for the EU and its Member States to generate funds to provide finance for REDD+ mitigation action. The paper evaluates options to mobilize long-term and predictable finance for REDD+ through additional international mitigation commitments, international cooperation, and EU-level policy instruments. REDD+ offers a unique opportunity for such additional mitigation action, considering that the negotiations defining REDD+ are comparatively advanced and REDD+ is already supported by implementation partnerships between developed countries and tropical forest countries.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 166
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agriculture and Deforestation: Is REDD+ Rooted In Evidence?
    Pirard, Romain
    Belna, Karine
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 : 62 - 70
  • [22] Financing REDD+: matching needs and ends
    Streck, Charlotte
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 628 - 637
  • [23] Benefits and sharing: realizing rights in REDD+
    Birrell, Kathleen
    Godden, Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 9 (01): : 6 - 31
  • [24] Remote Sensing Concepts and Their Applicability in REDD+ Monitoring
    Tokola, Timo
    [J]. CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2015, 1 (04): : 252 - 260
  • [25] Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services
    Corbera, Esteve
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 612 - 619
  • [26] Opportunities and Challenges for Ecological Restoration within REDD+
    Alexander, Sasha
    Nelson, Cara R.
    Aronson, James
    Lamb, David
    Cliquet, An
    Erwin, Kevin L.
    Finlayson, C. Max
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    Harris, Jim A.
    Higgs, Eric S.
    Hobbs, Richard J.
    Lewis, Roy R. Robin, III
    Martinez, Dennis
    Murcia, Carolina
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 19 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [27] A Crisis of Confidence: Stakeholder Experiences of REDD+ in Indonesia
    Ashley Enrici
    Klaus Hubacek
    [J]. Human Ecology, 2019, 47 : 39 - 50
  • [28] Policy persistence: REDD+ between stabilization and contestation
    Asiyanbi, Adeniyi
    Lund, Jens Friis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 27 : 378 - 400
  • [29] The critical importance of considering fire in REDD+ programs
    Barlow, Jos
    Parry, Luke
    Gardner, Toby A.
    Ferreira, Joice
    Aragao, Luiz E. O. C.
    Carmenta, Rachel
    Berenguer, Erika
    Vieira, Ima C. G.
    Souza, Carlos
    Cochrane, Mark A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 154 : 1 - 8
  • [30] Costs and carbon sequestration assessment for REDD+ in Indonesia
    Liu, Guifang
    Liu, Qing
    Song, Mengxiao
    Chen, Junsheng
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    Meng, Xing
    Zhao, Jincai
    Lu, Heli
    [J]. Forests, 2020, 11 (07):