CONGRESSIONAL VETO - CONTEMPORARY RESPONSE TO EXECUTIVE ENCROACHMENT ON LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES

被引：0

作者：

ABOUREZK, J ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] US SENATE,JUDICIARY COMM,SUBCOMM SEPARAT POWERS,WASHINGTON,DC 20510

来源：

INDIANA LAW JOURNAL | 1977年 / 52卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：323 / 343

页数：21

共 29 条

[21] CONGRESSIONAL VETO OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION PROBABLE RESPONSE TO A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE
不详
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1976, (02) : 285 - 300
[22] A LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR RESOLVING EXECUTIVE-PRIVILEGE DISPUTES PRECIPITATED BY CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS
HAMILTON, J
GRABOW, JC
HARVARD JOURNAL ON LEGISLATION, 1984, 21 (01) : 145 - 172
[23] VETO POWER AND LEGISLATION - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BARGAINING FROM 1961 TO 1986
MCCARTY, NM
POOLE, KT
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 11 (02): : 282 - 312
[24] THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE ABOUT LEGISLATIVE-EXECUTIVE SEPARATION OF POWERS
SARGENTICH, TO
CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1987, 72 (03) : 430 - 487
[25] CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES ON SMALL BUSINESS - PATTERN OF LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE-EXECUTIVE AGENCY RELATIONS
VINYARD, D
WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1968, 21 (03): : 391 - 399
[26] LEGISLATIVE INTENT VS EXECUTIVE NON-ENFORCEMENT - A NEW BOUNTY STATUTE AS A SOLUTION TO EXECUTIVE USURPATION OF CONGRESSIONAL POWER
ROGERS, GR
INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 1994, 69 (04) : 1257 - 1275
[27] Legislative responses to shared executive authority: How the prospects for executive branch coordination affect congressional budgetary authority under separated powers
Hollibaugh, Gary E.
Krause, George A.
PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2023, 53 (03) : 334 - 353
[28] Montesquieu Betrayed? Problematic Relations between the Executive and the Legislative in the Contemporary Italian and European Context
Zattoni, Matteo
MATERIALI PER UNA STORIA DELLA CULTURA GIURIDICA, 2016, 46 (01) : 31 - 57
[29] What Congress Had To Say: Legislative History as a Rehearsal of Congressional Response to Stern v. Marshall
Block-Lieb, Susan
AMERICAN BANKRUPTCY LAW JOURNAL, 2012, 86 (01): : 55 - 119

← 1 2 3 →