A prospective, randomized comparative study of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate versus photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser, in prostates less than 80 cc

被引:18
|
作者
Telli, Onur [1 ]
Okutucu, Tolga Muharrem [2 ]
Suer, Evren [2 ]
Burgu, Berk [2 ]
Gulpinar, Omer [2 ]
Yaman, Onder [2 ]
Bozkurt, Selen [3 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Antalya, Turkey
关键词
GreenLight; photoselective vaporization of prostate; prostatectomy; prostatic hyperplasia; transurethral resection of prostate;
D O I
10.1177/1756287214556643
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study we aimed to compare photoselective vaporization (PVP) with the GreenLight 120-W Laser and monopolar transurethral resection as surgical treatments of prostates less than 80 cc in men with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: From February 2009 to March 2012 we allocated 101 patients with a prostate glands of less than 80 cc; patients were randomly assigned for surgical treatment with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (n = 62) or PVP (n = 39). Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) postmicturition residual (PMR), transrectal ultrasound volumes (TRUS), postvoid urine residual (PVR), complications, re-operations and hospitalization time were collected. The patients were seen in the follow up at 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Median age was 69 (56-87) years old in the TURP group and 67 (51-87) years old in the PVP group. Mean preoperative prostate volume was 55 cc (40-72) and 60 cc (41-75) cc in the TURP group versus the PVP group. There was no statistically difference in subjectively (IPSS, SHIM) and objectively (Q(max)-PMR) parameters and postoperatively complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). A significant difference was observed in the PVP group with a 2 (1-4) days hospital stay compared with 5 (3-9) days for the TURP group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Prostate PVP and TURP are effective surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Postoperative functional improvements were durable and equivalent in the two groups. The two techniques have a similar complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate with the 120-W Lithium Triborate Laser in Men Taking Coumadin REPLY
    Woo, Henry H.
    Hossack, Tania A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 146 - 146
  • [42] Holmium Laser Ablation of the Prostate Versus Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate 60 cc or Less: Short-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Elzayat, Ehab A.
    Al-Mandil, Majid S.
    Khalaf, Ismail
    Elhilali, Mostafa M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (01): : 133 - 138
  • [43] Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate Using 80-W and 120-W Laser Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis from 2002 to 2012
    Thangasamy, Isaac A.
    Chalasani, Venu
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Wood, Henry H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (02) : 315 - 323
  • [44] Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate with the 120-W Lithium Triborate Laser in Men Taking Coumadin COMMENT
    Ulchaker, James C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 145 - 146
  • [45] One-year Surgical Outcomes of Complete or Incomplete Enucleation of Prostate by Monopolar Electrocoagulation, Photoselective Vapoenucleation of 120-W GreenLight Laser, and Holmium Laser
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Park, Juhyun
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Jeong, Hyeon
    Son, Hwancheol
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2017, 108 : 142 - 148
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness analysis at 2 years of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight-Photo vaporization 120W versus transurethral resection of the prostate
    Benejam-Gual, J. M.
    Sanz-Granda, A.
    Garcia-Miralles Gravalos, R.
    Severa-Ruiz de Velasco, A.
    Pons-Viver, J.
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (04): : 238 - 243
  • [47] The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study
    Sanwei Guo
    Georg Müller
    Kurt Lehmann
    Scherwin Talimi
    Gernot Bonkat
    Heike Püschel
    Thomas Gasser
    Alexander Bachmann
    Malte Rieken
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 2015, 30 : 1147 - 1151
  • [48] The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study
    Guo, Sanwei
    Mueller, Georg
    Lehmann, Kurt
    Talimi, Scherwin
    Bonkat, Gernot
    Pueschel, Heike
    Gasser, Thomas
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Rieken, Malte
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (03) : 1147 - 1151
  • [49] A prospective comparative study of channel photoselective vaporization of the prostate vs. channel transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma
    Kumar, Niraj
    Vasudeva, Pawan
    Kumar, Anup
    Singh, Harbinder
    Sinha, Ashmika
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2016, 68 (04) : 330 - 336
  • [50] DIODE LASER VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE WITH THE 980NM 200-W HIGH INTENSITY DIODE LASER VERSUS PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE WITH THE 120-W HPS-LASER-2-YEAR RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE NON-RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Rieken, M.
    Bonkat, G.
    Wyler, S.
    Gasser, T. C.
    Bachmann, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A64 - A64