A New Visual Field Test: Rarebit Perimetry

被引:0
|
作者
Yavas, Guliz Fatma [1 ]
Kusbeci, Tuncay [1 ]
Ozturk, Faruk [1 ]
Ermis, Sitk Samet [1 ]
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Tip Fak Goz Hastaiklari AD, Afyon, Turkey
关键词
Visual field; rarebit perimetry; hit rate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the results of a new visual field test, rarebit perimetry in normal patients. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one eyes of 16 patients were included in the study. Ophthalmic examination and Humphrey visual field were normal in all cases. Regular test and fovea test were done in rarebit test. Mean hit rate for central 30 degrees and fovea were calculated as the mean of all tested locations. In addition, for central 300 mean hit rate was calculated for upper temporal quadrant, upper nasalquadrant, inferior temporal and inferior nasal quadrant. Results: Mean age of the cases was 32,6+/-6,8 years. Mean hit ratewas in regular test % 92.7 +/- 3.4 and in fovea test % 96.75. In regular test mean hit rate was in upper temporal quad-rant % 93.05+/-3.53, upper nasal quadrant % 92.65+/-3.63, inferior temporal quadrant % 92.4+/-3.49 and inferior nasal quadrant % 92.95+/-3.07. Mean test time in regular test was 5.57+/-0.46 minutes. Conclusion: Rarebit perimetry is a reliable visual field test in which the test time is short and the test is easy to perform for the cases.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 269
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: Rarebit perimetry
    Yavas, G. F.
    Kusbeci, T.
    Eser, O.
    Ermis, S. S.
    Cosar, M.
    Ozturk, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 628 - 632
  • [2] Rarebit Perimetry: Number of Test Passes Needed to Identify Visual Field Defects
    Greene, D. P.
    Houston, S. K., III
    Newman, S. A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [3] Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry
    Brusini, P
    Salvetat, ML
    Parisi, L
    Zeppieri, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (02) : 180 - 184
  • [4] Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
    Celebisoy, Nese
    Ozturk, Taylan
    Kose, Timur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 756 - 762
  • [5] Quantitative Measurement of Fixation Stability During RareBit Perimetry and Humphrey Visual Field Testing
    Lin, Shawn R.
    Lai, Isabella N.
    Dutta, Sanjeev
    Singh, Kuldev
    Chang, Robert T.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (02) : 100 - 104
  • [6] Determining Mechanisms of Visual Loss in Glaucoma Using Rarebit Perimetry
    Hackett, Deborah A.
    Anderson, Andrew J.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2011, 88 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [7] Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery
    Nilsson, Maria
    Abdiu, Oran
    Laurell, Carl-Gustaf
    Martin, Lene
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 88 (04) : 479 - 482
  • [8] Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability
    Chin, Chee-Fang
    Yip, Leonard W.
    Sim, Danny C.
    Yeo, Anna C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 39 (08): : 752 - 759
  • [9] Reproducibility of RAREbit perimetry in normal subjects
    Drudy, ER
    Newman, SA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [10] Rarebit Perimetry for Bedside Testing: Comparison With Standard Automated Perimetry
    Houston, Samuel K. Steven
    Weber, Eric D.
    Koga, Sebastian F.
    Newman, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) : 243 - 247