A COMPARISON OF CORTICAL STRAIN AFTER CEMENTED AND PRESS-FIT PROXIMAL AND DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT

被引:11
|
作者
HUA, J [1 ]
WALKER, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, INST ORTHOPAED, DEPT BIOMED ENGN, STANMORE HA7 4LP, MIDDX, ENGLAND
关键词
FEMUR; PROXIMAL AND DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENTS; STRAINS; PHOTOELASTIC COATING; MAJOR ENDOPROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100100516
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Proximal and distal femoral replacements with intramedullary stems are usually cemented in place but frequently show severe bone remodeling changes in the long term, which can contribute to a loosening process. The remodeling is likely to be associated with stress and strain distribution. This study compared the strain patterns, particularly the maximum principal strains, between cemented and press-fit components in five cadaveric femurs by using a photoelastic coating technique. The specimens were loaded with 2,000 N in the sequences of intact femur and press-fit and cemented stems. On the medial side of the bone for proximal femoral replacements, the strain values for the press-fit stems on the proximal, middle, and distal regions were 73 +/- 11%, 78 +/- 15%, and 80 +/- 15% of normal, respectively, but for the cemented stems they were 53 +/- 15%, 57 +/- 19%, and 60 +/- 20%. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). On the lateral side, the overall strain values for the press-fit stem were higher than those for the cemented stem, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). On the medial side of the distal femoral replacement, the strain values for the press-fit stems in the proximal and middle regions were significantly closer to normal than for the cemented stems. Because the press-fit femoral stems (both the proximal and distal replacement) transferred closer to normal strains than the cemented stems, less adverse bone remodeling may be expected, which could be reflected in increased longevity.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 744
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Similar Short Term Outcomes with Press-fit Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Cemented Total Hip Replacements in Femoral Neck Fractures
    Vermesan, Dinu
    Prejbeanu, Radu
    Haragus, Horia
    Niculescu, Marius
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2017, 54 (02) : 262 - 264
  • [32] Global fit concept in revision hip arthroplasty for cementless press-fit femoral stems
    Canovas, F.
    LeBeguec, P.
    Batard, J.
    Gaillard, F.
    Dagneaux, L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (04) : 579 - 581
  • [33] Outcomes of press-fit uncemented versus cemented hip arthroplasty in the oncologic patient
    Larsen, Christopher G.
    Crockatt, William K.
    Fitzgerald, Michael
    Matos, Nanette
    Goodman, Howard J.
    Kenan, Samuel
    Kenan, Shachar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 22 : 198 - 202
  • [34] Risk Factors for Femoral Fracture after Canine Press-Fit Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Ganz, Seth Mathus
    Jackson, Joshua
    VanEnkevort, Bruce
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2010, 39 (06) : 688 - 695
  • [35] Increased Anteversion of Press-fit Femoral Stems Compared With Anatomic Femur
    Emerson, Roger H., Jr.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (02) : 477 - 481
  • [36] Excellent results of a femoral press-fit stem cemented with a thin mantle: 116 hips followed for 11–18 yearsExcellents résultats d’une tige fémorale press-fit cimentée
    Erling Gjengedal
    Gisle Uppheim
    Håvard Bjerkholt
    Øystein Høvik
    Olav Reikerås
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2007, 17 : 279 - 284
  • [37] Biomechanical evaluation of press-fit femoral fixation technique in ACL reconstruction
    Attila Pavlik
    Péter Hidas
    Tibor Czigány
    István Berkes
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2004, 12 : 528 - 533
  • [39] Biomechanical evaluation of press-fit femoral fixation technique in ACL reconstruction
    Pavlik, A
    Hidas, P
    Czigány, T
    Berkes, I
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2004, 12 (06) : 528 - 533
  • [40] PRESS-FIT DESIGN IN TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LUBINUS AND STANMORE PROSTHESES
    BURGAARD, P
    OLSEN, PA
    JENSEN, NM
    ANDERSEN, PB
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 58 (03): : 326 - 326