Robustness Consideration in Multi-Criteria Decision Making to an Aircraft Selection Problem

被引:16
|
作者
Sun, Xiaoqian [1 ]
Gollnick, Volker [1 ]
Stumpf, Eike [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Air Transportat Syst, Blohmstr 18, D-21079 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); robustness; uncertainty; aircraft selection;
D O I
10.1002/mcda.471
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In aircraft concept selection, uncertainties, resulting from economic noise variables such as fuel price, load factor, so on always exist in the decision making process. These uncertainties are often addressed using Taguchi loss functions for robustness analysis. The study presented in this paper is to utilize multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods to solve an aircraft concept selection problem for a hypothetical airline when considering the robustness of the decision. Three MCDM methods were used to conduct the concept selection, including ELimination and Choice Expressing REality, simple additive weighting and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. In this study, robustness is introduced as an additional decision criterion in the aircraft selection process. The impact with and without robustness consideration is compared in order to demonstrate how the proposed method makes trade-offs between nominal performance and address uncertainty in the decision-making process. In addition, sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the influence of the decision criteria, especially robustness, on the final ranking of alternatives. The implementation of three MCDM methods on the aircraft selection problem also demonstrates the potential application of MCDM methods in the assessment of air transportation systems, while balancing economical, ecological, and technical constraints. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 64
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem
    Ozcan, Tuncay
    Celebi, Numan
    Esnaf, Sakir
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (08) : 9773 - 9779
  • [32] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    [J]. IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [33] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Scheme for Multi-Aircraft Conflict Resolution
    Yang, Yang
    Prandini, Maria
    Cao, Xianbin
    Du, Wenbo
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 14674 - 14679
  • [34] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [35] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [36] Fundamentals of multi-criteria decision making
    不详
    [J]. EFFICIENCY VERSUS SUSTAINABILITY IN DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING, 2002, 520 : 21 - 73
  • [37] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [38] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423
  • [39] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [40] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157