DNA DENSITOMETRY OF COLORECTAL-CANCER

被引:11
|
作者
DEANS, GT
WILLIAMSON, K
HAMILTON, P
HEATLEY, M
ARTHURS, K
PATTERSON, CC
ROWLANDS, BJ
PARKS, TG
SPENCE, RAJ
机构
[1] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,ROYAL VICTORIA HOSP,DEPT SURG,BELFAST BT7 1NN,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
[2] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,ROYAL VICTORIA HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,BELFAST BT7 1NN,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
[3] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & PUBL HLTH,BELFAST BT7 1NN,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.34.11.1566
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
DNA analysis was assessed by densitometry for 281 cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Detection of aneuploidy in a single case rose from 65% if one, to 92.5% when three or more sections, were analysed. Although aneuploid tumours had significantly larger nuclear areas than near diploid tumours (p 0.009), densitometric measurements showed no association with clinicopathogical variables. DNA content determined by densitometry was compared with that from flow cytometry on 465 tissue sections from 241 cases. Aneuploidy assessed by flow cytometry was significantly associated with that determined by densitometry (p<0.01 for all comparisons), ploidy state being similar in 381 sections (82%, kappa=0.63, p<0.001), and 187 cases (77-6%, kappa=0.57, p<0.001). Univariate survival analysis showed that DNA densitometric variables had no significant association with survival in (a) all cases, (b) cases without lymph node metastases, or (c) cases without distant metastases. Multivariate regression analysis of densitometric and clinicopathological variables identified Dukes's stage, patient age, and tumour differentiation as the combination of variables most closely related to survival. Densitometric measurement of DNA content could not significantly improve on the prognostic model containing these three variables. It is concluded that, although the assessment of DNA content by densitometry is comparable with that of flow cytometry, conventional histological variables remain the best predictors of prognosis in colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1566 / 1571
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INFLUENCE OF TUMOR-CELL DNA IN COLORECTAL-CANCER
    ARMITAGE, NC
    WRIGHT, J
    EVANS, DF
    BALLANTYNE, KC
    HARDCASTLE, D
    GUT, 1988, 29 (05) : A732 - A732
  • [22] FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA INDEX IN THE PROGNOSIS OF COLORECTAL-CANCER
    GIARETTI, W
    DANOVA, M
    GEIDO, E
    MAZZINI, G
    SCIALLERO, S
    ASTE, H
    SCIVETTI, P
    RICCARDI, A
    MARSANO, B
    MERLO, F
    DAMORE, ESG
    CANCER, 1991, 67 (07) : 1921 - 1927
  • [23] INFLUENCE OF DNA ABNORMALITIES ON THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER
    ARMITAGE, NC
    ROBBINS, RA
    BALDWIN, RW
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    GUT, 1984, 25 (10) : 1192 - 1193
  • [24] Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Ransohoff, David F.
    Itzkowitz, Steven H.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Lavin, Philip
    Lidgard, Graham P.
    Ahlquist, David A.
    Berger, Barry M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (14): : 1287 - 1297
  • [26] A SEGREGATION ANALYSIS OF COLORECTAL-CANCER IN FAMILIES OF COLORECTAL-CANCER PROBANDS
    PUGH, EW
    BAILEYWILSON, JE
    RICE, J
    CHEN, V
    ELSTON, RC
    LYNCH, HT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1993, 53 (03) : 845 - 845
  • [27] PREVENTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER - ROLE OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN GALLSTONES AND COLORECTAL-CANCER
    GAFA, M
    SARLI, L
    SANSEBASTIANO, G
    LONGINOTTI, E
    CARRERAS, F
    PIETRA, N
    PERACCHIA, A
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1987, 30 (09) : 692 - 696
  • [28] FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA PLOIDY IN COLORECTAL ADENOMAS AND FAMILY HISTORY OF COLORECTAL-CANCER
    SCIALLERO, S
    BRUNO, S
    DIVINCI, A
    GEIDO, E
    ASTE, H
    GIARETTI, W
    CANCER, 1988, 61 (01) : 114 - 120
  • [29] THE BIOLOGICAL AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF DNA PLOIDY IN COLORECTAL-CANCER
    JONES, DJ
    HARAN, D
    MOORE, M
    SCHOFIELD, PF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 56 (02) : 188 - 188
  • [30] DNA POLYMERASE-BETA MUTATIONS IN HUMAN COLORECTAL-CANCER
    WANG, LM
    PATEL, U
    GHOSH, L
    BANERJEE, S
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (17) : 4824 - 4827