RELIABILITY-BASED BRIDGE DESIGN AND LIFE-CYCLE MANAGEMENT WITH MARKOV DECISION-PROCESSES

被引:29
|
作者
TAO, ZW
COROTIS, RB
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
[2] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,DEPT GEOG & ENVIRONM ENGN,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
关键词
BRIDGES; COST; MAINTENANCE; MANAGEMENT; MARKOV PROCESS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.1016/0167-4730(94)00030-T
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A Markov Decision Process-based (MDP) modelling approach is used to identify optimal structural designs and their associated maintenance policies. This approach has the desirable attributes of capturing the dynamics of the coupled structural design/maintenance problem while yieldding a mathematical model that is computationally tractable. Implicit in the MDP is the computationally and theoretically usful choice of modelling the dynamics of structural performance and maintenance actions as two related but separate processes. Structural resistance deterioration due to corrosion and stochastic structural loading are modelled in the MDP as a ''self-transition'' process, that is, a process that models structural performance without maintenance intervention. A suite of maintenance actions and their associated costs constitute the core of the ''decision effect'' process. These two processes, made computationally operational through the development of self-transition and decision effect matrices, are then combined into a joint transition matrix, with which we can model the effects of maintenance actions on bridge performance and costs. Initial designs and their associated minimum expected, discounted lifetime costs are identified with the MDP for a two girder bridge.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 132
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of life-cycle analysis based new bridge management system in Korea
    Sun, J. -W.
    Park, K. -H.
    Lee, S. -Y.
    Song, J. -J.
    Kong, J. -S.
    Yong, H.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 2254 - 2261
  • [42] Reliability Based Life Cycle Management of Bridge Subjected to Fatigue Damage
    Stipanovic, Irina
    Connolly, Lorcan
    Palic, Sandra Skaric
    Duranovic, Marko
    Donnelly, Roisin
    Bernardini, Ilaria
    Bakker, Jaap
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6
  • [43] RELIABILITY PARAMETER AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR LIFE-CYCLE MANAGEMENT
    BAGLOW, RL
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1975, 14 (02): : 91 - 104
  • [44] EARLY DESIGN PHASE LIFE-CYCLE RELIABILITY MODELING
    KOLARIK, W
    DAVENPORT, J
    FANT, E
    MCCOUN, K
    PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1987, (SYM): : 335 - 340
  • [45] Multi-Objective Reliability-Based Optimization of Life-Cycle Maintenance for Bridges under Cost Uncertainty
    Montazeri, Niloofar
    Touran, Ali
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2018: SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION AND EDUCATION, 2018, : 440 - 449
  • [46] Life-cycle design - economical and ecological decision making
    Hesselbach, J
    Herrmann, C
    Richter, O
    Flake, M
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRIBOLOGY IN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 2000: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERACTING SURFACES - A KEY FACTOR IN SUSTAINABLE AND ECONOMIC PRODUCTS, 2000, : 87 - 95
  • [47] Bridge life-cycle management in the service of the Finnish Road Administration
    Airaksinen, Matti
    Soderqvist, Marja-Kaarina
    LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, : 71 - 78
  • [48] Bridge preventive maintenance based on life-cycle assessment
    de Leon Escobedo, David
    Torres Acosta, Andres
    REVISTA TECNICA DE LA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2010, 33 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [49] Reliability-based life prediction of aging concrete bridge decks
    Lounis, Z
    INTERNATIONAL RILEM WORKSHOP ON LIFE PREDICTION AND AGING MANAGEMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES, 2000, 16 : 229 - 238
  • [50] Reliability-based life cycle assessment for future solid waste management alternatives in Portugal
    Pires, Ana
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Martinho, Graca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (04): : 316 - 337