A case study of the co-production approach to the implementation of education for sustainable development in Thailand

被引:3
|
作者
Nuamcharoen, Suwida [1 ]
Dhirathiti, Nopraenue S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION | 2018年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
Sustainable development; sustainability; education for sustainable development; co-production; community engagement; education policy;
D O I
10.1177/1478210317739487
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Thailand is a good example of a developing country which is struggling with globally common problems in trying to find solutions for sustainable education development. Education is one of the important methods to build the mindset of Thai people toward sustainable development (SD). The co-production approach is a way of improving public services, including education for sustainable development (ESD). The study employs qualitative research techniques which aim at studying the implementation and co-production of ESD. Moreover, it is to explore and synthesize the implementation characteristics of co-producing ESD in Thailand. The research found 12 correlated indicators from the literature that link SD, ESD and co-production practices. They were categorized into input, process and output of the cycle of implementing and co-producing ESD. The indicators were examined within the context of the case study of Bansankong School. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders that included representatives from the school administration, families and communities, local authorities, other relevant institutions and volunteers. The results showed that factors in the process portion of the cycle of implementing and co-producing ESD tended to be more significant; these were community engagement, information technology and media usage, and the contingency approach. The factors in the input portion of the process, namely, self-reliance and self-efficiency of population and leadership, and the factor of mutual benefits in the output portion proved to be significant. The other seven factors, cultural adaptation, democratic participation, equitability, goal of sustainable future, interdependence, interdisciplinary approaches and collaborative approach and partnership, appeared to be non-significant.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 345
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A case for co-production
    Vikram, Anvita
    Siniscalchi, Madeleine
    Banerji, Anita
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 35 : 4 - 4
  • [2] The co-production of sustainable future scenarios
    Iwaniec, David M.
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Davidson, Melissa J.
    Berbes-Blazquez, Marta
    Georgescu, Matei
    Krayenhoff, E. Scott
    Middel, Ariane
    Sampson, David A.
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2020, 197
  • [3] Co-Production from the Viewpoint of Design and Computing Education Development
    Zarina, Solvita
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2020, 8 (04): : 484 - 495
  • [4] Sustainable development of biorefineries: integrated assessment method for co-production pathways
    Byun, Jaewon
    Han, Jeehoon
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 13 (08) : 2233 - 2242
  • [5] Democratizing co-production of sustainable public services
    Lopez-De-Ipina, D.
    Brandsen, T.
    Steen, T.
    Misikangas, P.
    Sarasa, D.
    Mueller, A. P. Rodriguez
    Edelmann, N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2022: Intelligent Technologies, Governments and Citizens, 2022, : 497 - 499
  • [6] Providing a roadmap for co-production in curriculum development for nursing and midwifery education
    Wilson, Christine Brown
    Slade, Christine
    McCutcheon, Karen
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 113
  • [7] Education for sustainable development: a case study approach - catalytic convertors for cars - a sustainable solution?
    Duff, C
    Hulse, J
    [J]. DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2003, 2003, : 265 - 275
  • [8] Politicizing sustainable development: the co-production of globalized evidence-based policy
    Elgert, Laureen
    [J]. CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2010, 3 (3-4) : 375 - 390
  • [9] Advancements of sustainable development goals in co-production for climate change adaptation research
    Dannevig, Halvor
    Korsbrekke, Mari Hanssen
    Hovelsrud, Grete K.
    [J]. CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36
  • [10] Overcoming politics with markets? The co-production of sustainable development in urban and regional planning
    Krueger, Rob
    [J]. PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2015, 16 (01) : 121 - 125