机构:
Univ South Africa, Dept Mercantile Law, Pretoria, South AfricaUniv South Africa, Dept Mercantile Law, Pretoria, South Africa
Rutherford, B. R.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ South Africa, Dept Mercantile Law, Pretoria, South Africa
来源:
COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICA-CILSA
|
2010年
/
43卷
/
02期
关键词:
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
In terms of South African law, comparative advertising may be unlawful on two grounds, namely the common law relating to unlawful competition and infringement of a registered trade mark. Under the common law comparative advertising is generally permitted unless the advertisement contains untrue disparaging allegations. As far as trade-mark legislation is concerned, it was generally believed that comparative advertising amounted to trade-mark infringement. However, recent decisions in Europe and South Africa have introduced restrictions into the infringement provisions which limit the infringement rights of trade-mark proprietors. This article discusses these restrictions and compares the approaches adopted in Europe and South Africa and their effect on the lawfulness of comparative advertising.