Demonstrating and Monetizing the Multiple Benefits from Using SuDS

被引:20
|
作者
Ashley, R. M. [1 ]
Gersonius, B. [2 ]
Digman, C. [3 ]
Horton, B. [3 ]
Bacchin, T. [4 ]
Smith, B. [5 ]
Shaffer, P. [6 ]
Baylis, A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ecofutures Ltd, 3 Greendale Ct, Honley HD9 6JW, England
[2] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, NL-2611 AX Delft, Netherlands
[3] MWH Part Stantec, Red Hall Ave, Paragon Business Village WF1 2UL, Wakefield, England
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Urbanism, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[5] Yorkshire Water, Western House,Halifax Rd, Bradford BD6 2SZ, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Construct Ind Res & Informat Assoc, Griffin Ct,15 Long Ln, London EC1A 9PN, England
[7] Environm Agcy, Horizon House,Deanery Rd, Bristol BS1 5AH, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1061/JSWBAY.0000848
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) measures provide a wide range of benefits beyond simply dealing with stormwater. In the United Kingdom such measures are termed sustainable drainage systems (SuDS). There are a number of tools and procedures for assessing the benefits provided, some of which give a monetized bottom line. A U.K. project led by the Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) has reviewed the available knowledge and techniques for valuing GSI and other benefits, and from this developed a new freely available valuation tool, known as the Benefits of SuDS Tool (BeST). This has been further developed to include spatial and temporal planning for the incremental implementation of a portfolio of SuDS over time and in extent. The tool is now being used in various countries for scenario planning to assist decision makers to explore future options and their relative robustness and flexibility over time. Case studies are presented from the United Kingdom and the Netherlands to illustrate the use of the tool and methods developed. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple Benefits
    Waste Disposal Water Manage Aust, 5 (09):
  • [42] Multiple benefits
    Skene, K
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1996, 150 (2026) : 59 - 59
  • [43] Using diatoms to assess human impacts on streams benefits from multiple-habitat sampling
    Smucker, Nathan J.
    Vis, Morgan L.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2010, 654 (01) : 93 - 109
  • [44] Using diatoms to assess human impacts on streams benefits from multiple-habitat sampling
    Nathan J. Smucker
    Morgan L. Vis
    Hydrobiologia, 2010, 654 : 93 - 109
  • [45] Multiple benefits
    Reynolds, Patrick
    International Water Power and Dam Construction, 2010, 62 (08): : 26 - 27
  • [46] Assessing Reliability, Resilience and Vulnerability of Water Supply from SuDS
    Sulis, Andrea
    Altana, Martina
    Sanna, Gianfranco
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [47] Benefits from multiple perspectives: A consumer's view
    Frese, FJ
    OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH, 2002, 22 : 103S - 103S
  • [48] Multiple levels of health benefits from resistant starch
    Guo, Jiayue
    Tan, Libo
    Kong, Lingyan
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [49] Estimating multiple benefits from vegetation in mediterranean ecosystems
    Gili Koniak
    Imanuel Noy-Meir
    Avi Perevolotsky
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009, 18 : 3483 - 3501
  • [50] Estimating multiple benefits from vegetation in mediterranean ecosystems
    Koniak, Gili
    Noy-Meir, Imanuel
    Perevolotsky, Avi
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2009, 18 (13) : 3483 - 3501