Return to Play After Open Bankart Repair A Systematic Review

被引:7
|
作者
Stone, Geoffrey P. [1 ,3 ]
Pearsall, Albert W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Sect Sports Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 3421 Med Pk Dr, Mobile, AL 36693 USA
[3] Univ S Alabama, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
来源
关键词
Bankart; open Bankart; return to play;
D O I
10.1177/2325967114522960
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Results of open Bankart repair have been well reported. However, less information is available outlining the timetable for return to play (RTP) in athletes after this procedure. Purpose: To review the current literature regarding (1) the timetable recommended for athletes to RTP after an open Bankart repair and (2) the objective criteria on which the decision to allow an athlete to RTP is based. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of all relevant English-language articles using the electronic databases OVID and PubMed between the years 1947 and 2012 to identify open Bankart repair. Two reviewers screened articles for eligibility based on the following criteria: (1) an open Bankart repair, (2) a minimum follow-up of at least 8 months, (3) any report that described the procedure in athletes, and (4) any report that described the time for an athlete to RTP. All relevant data were collected and analyzed with regard to number of patients; mean follow-up; Rowe, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) scores; redislocation rate; and return-to-sport timing. Results: In all, 559 relevant citations were identified, of which 29 articles met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 51.7 months (range, 8-162 months), and the mean age was 25.9 years (range, 21-31 years). The average Rowe score for all studies was 86.9 (range, 63-90). The average redislocation rate was 5.3%. Twenty-six of 29 studies cited a specific timetable for unrestricted RTP, with an average of 23.2 weeks (range, 12-36 weeks). Only 38% of authors reported sport-specific criteria for return to competition, with the majority allowing return to noncontact sports at 12 to 16 weeks, and the resumption of throwing/contact sports by 24 weeks. Three reports described specific functional parameters for RTP. Conclusion: The current review summarized return-to-play guidelines for athletic competition after open Bankart repair. These data may provide general guidelines to aid surgeons when determining the appropriate timetable to allow an athlete to return to unrestricted competition.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Return to Play After Revision Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review
    Lau, Brian C.
    Pineda, Lorena Bejarano
    Johnston, Tyler R.
    Gregory, Bonnie P.
    Wu, Mark
    Fletcher, Amanda N.
    Ledbetter, Leila
    Riboh, Jonathan C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [22] Return to Play After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Manjunath, Amit K.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (04): : 1094 - 1100
  • [23] Return to Play After Isolated Meniscal Repairs in Athletes: A Systematic Review
    Blanchard, Erica R.
    Hadley, Christopher J.
    Wicks, Eric D.
    Emper, William
    Cohen, Steven B.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (11)
  • [24] Return to Play After Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation of the Capitellum: A Systematic Review
    Kirsch, Jacob M.
    Thomas, Jared R.
    Khan, Moin
    Townsend, Whitney A.
    Lawton, Jeffrey N.
    Bedi, Asheesh
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (07): : 1412 - +
  • [25] Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Mingtao
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Jia, Yaofei
    Zhang, Guangrui
    Zhou, Jianping
    Wu, Ding
    Jiang, Jin
    Yun, Xiangdong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [26] Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mingtao Zhang
    Jiaxin Liu
    Yaofei Jia
    Guangrui Zhang
    Jianping Zhou
    Ding Wu
    Jin Jiang
    Xiangdong Yun
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [27] Outpatient open Bankart repair
    Levy, HJ
    Mashoof, AA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (03): : 377 - 379
  • [28] Arthroscopic Remplissage Combined With Bankart Repair Results in a Higher Rate of Return to Sport in Athletes Compared With Bankart Repair Alone or the Latarjet Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Davis, William H.
    DiPasquale, Jake A.
    Patel, Reema K.
    Sandler, Alexis B.
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Dunn, John C.
    Parnes, Nata
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (12): : 3304 - 3312
  • [29] Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
    Yon, Chang-Jin
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Du-Han
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (11) : 1 - 12
  • [30] Return to Sport After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review
    Belk, John W.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Mei-Dan, Omer
    Houck, Darby A.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (06)