Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis

被引:0
|
作者
Yong-Gang SUI [1 ]
Cheng YANG [1 ]
Chang-Dong GUAN [2 ]
Yan-Lu XU [1 ]
Na-Qiong WU [1 ]
Wei-Xian YANG [1 ]
Yong-Jian WU [1 ]
Ke-Fei DOU [1 ]
Yue-Jin YANG [1 ]
Shu-Bin QIAO [1 ]
Wei YU [3 ]
Bo XU [2 ,4 ]
Sheng-Xian TU [3 ]
Jie QIAN [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[2] Catheterization Laboratories, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
[3] Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
[4] National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R54 [心脏、血管(循环系)疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio(UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve(FFR) from intravascular ultrasound(IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main(LM) stenosis.METHODS This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions(diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area(MLA) in a blinded fashion.RESULTS Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients(mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified(r = 0.688, P < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03(standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve(AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94(95% CI: 0.87–1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50%(AUC = 0.66, P < 0.001)and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA(AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9%(95% CI: 70.2–95.7), 93.1%(95% CI: 82.2–100.0), 58.3%(95% CI: 26.3–90.4), respectively.CONCLUSION In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intravascular Ultrasound and Fractional Flow Reserve in Assessment of the Intermediate Coronary Stenosis What You See Is Not What You Get
    Stankovic, Goran
    Dobric, Milan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (09) : 924 - 925
  • [32] Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound for PCI
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    Kang, Jeehoon
    Wang, Jian'an
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (22): : 2097 - 2099
  • [33] Functional Versus Anatomical Stenosis Evaluation Fractional Flow Reserve Defeats Intravascular Ultrasound
    Rioufol, Gilles
    Finet, Gerard
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (07) : 812 - 813
  • [34] Superiority of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Coronary Stenoses Reply
    Waksman, Ron
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Legutko, Jacek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (02) : 164 - 165
  • [35] A Comparative Study of the Effect of Lesion Length on the Assessment of the Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis by Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound
    Takagi, Kensuke
    Al-Lamee, Rasha
    Latih, Azeem
    Ielasi, Alfonso
    Godino, Cosmo
    Mussardo, Marco
    Arioli, Francesco
    Piraino, Daniela
    Figini, Filippo
    Carlino, Mauro
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Colombo, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (13) : B96 - B97
  • [36] Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for the Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Correlations With Fractional Flow Reserve/Intravascular Ultrasound and Prognostic Implications: The iLITRO-EPIC07 Study
    Rodriguez-Leor, Oriol
    de la Torre Hernandez, Jose Maria
    Garcia-Camarero, Tamara
    Garcia del Blanco, Bruno
    Lopez-Palop, Ramon
    Fernandez-Nofrerias, Eduard
    Cuellas Ramon, Carlos
    Jimenez-Kockar, Marcelo
    Jimenez-Mazuecos, Jesus
    Fernandez Salinas, Francisco
    Gomez-Lara, Josep
    Brugaletta, Salvatore
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Palma, Ricardo
    Gomez-Menchero, Antonio E.
    Millan, Raul
    Tejada Ponce, David
    Linares Vicente, Jose Antonio
    Ojeda, Soledad
    Pinar, Eduardo
    Fernandez-Pelegrina, Estefania
    Morales-Ponce, Francisco J.
    Cid-alvarez, Ana Belen
    Rama-Merchan, Juan Carlos
    Molina Navarro, Eduardo
    Escaned, Javier
    Perez de Prado, Armando
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (11) : 861 - 871
  • [37] Prediction of fractional flow reserve using intravascular ultrasound
    Okubo, Munenori
    Kawasaki, Masanori
    Yagami, Hiroyuki
    Tanigaki, Toru
    Kawase, Yoshiaki
    Matsuo, Hitoshi
    Suzuki, Takahiko
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2024, 20 (19)
  • [38] Invasive assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis - comparison of intracoronary ultrasound with fractional flow reserve
    Legutko, J
    Dudek, D
    Wizimirski, M
    Zmudka, K
    Dubiel, J
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 12 - 12
  • [39] Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment of Left Main Stenosis in the Presence of Downstream Coronary Stenoses
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Daniels, David
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Ikeno, Fumiaki
    Lyons, Jennifer
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [40] Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment of Left Main Stenosis in the Presence of Downstream Coronary Stenoses
    Karabay, Can Yucel
    Akgun, Taylan
    Kocabay, Gonenc
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (04) : E56 - E56