Recommendations for exercise adherence measures in musculoskeletal settings: A systematic review and consensus meeting (protocol)

被引:56
|
作者
Holden M.A. [1 ]
Haywood K.L. [2 ]
Potia T.A. [3 ]
Gee M. [4 ]
McLean S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele
[2] Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry
[3] Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
[4] Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
关键词
Acceptability; Adherence; Consensus; Exercise; Measurement; Musculoskeletal disorders; Physical activity; Quality; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-3-10
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Exercise programmes are frequently advocated for the management of musculoskeletal disorders; however, adherence is an important pre-requisite for their success. The assessment of exercise adherence requires the use of relevant and appropriate measures, but guidance for appropriate assessment does not exist. This research will identify and evaluate the quality and acceptability of all measures used to assess exercise adherence within a musculoskeletal setting, seeking to reach consensus for the most relevant and appropriate measures for application in research and/or clinical practice settings. Methods/design: There are two key stages to the proposed research. First, a systematic review of the quality and acceptability of measures used to assess exercise adherence in musculoskeletal disorders; second, a consensus meeting. The systematic review will be conducted in two phases and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a robust methodology. Phase one will identify all measures that have been used to assess exercise adherence in a musculoskeletal setting. Phase two will seek to identify published and unpublished evidence of the measurement and practical properties of identified measures. Study quality will be assessed against the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. A shortlist of best quality measures will be produced for consideration during stage two: a meeting of relevant stakeholders in the United Kingdom during which consensus on the most relevant and appropriate measures of exercise adherence for application in research and/or clinical practice settings will be sought. Discussion: This study will benefit clinicians who seek to evaluate patients' levels of exercise adherence and those intending to undertake research, service evaluation, or audit relating to exercise adherence in the musculoskeletal field. The findings will impact upon new research studies which aim to understand the factors that predict adherence with exercise and which test different adherence-enhancing interventions. PROSPERO reference: CRD42013006212. © 2014 Holden et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines
    Stout, Nicole L.
    Santa Mina, Daniel
    Lyons, Kathleen D.
    Robb, Karen
    Silver, Julie K.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (02) : 149 - 175
  • [32] Digital Rehabilitation Programs Improve Therapeutic Exercise Adherence for Patients With Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Zhi-yuan
    Tian, Lv
    He, Kang
    Xu, Lin
    Wang, Xiao-qi
    Huang, Lu
    Yi, Jiang
    Liu, Zhong-liang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 52 (11): : 726 - 739
  • [33] Level of adherence to prescribed exercise in spondyloarthritis and factors affecting this adherence: a systematic review
    McDonald, M. T.
    Siebert, S.
    Coulter, E. H.
    McDonald, D. A.
    Paul, L.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (02) : 187 - 201
  • [34] Level of adherence to prescribed exercise in spondyloarthritis and factors affecting this adherence: a systematic review
    M. T. McDonald
    S. Siebert
    E. H. Coulter
    D. A. McDonald
    L. Paul
    Rheumatology International, 2019, 39 : 187 - 201
  • [35] A review of musculoskeletal ultrasound training guidelines and recommendations for sport and exercise medicine physicians
    Boyce, S. H.
    Murray, A. D.
    Jeffrey, M.
    ULTRASOUND, 2013, 21 (03) : 155 - 158
  • [36] Role of security guards in healthcare settings: a protocol for a systematic review
    Shongwe, Lindokuhle
    Hanft-Robert, Saskia
    Cossie, Qhama
    Sithole, Philasande
    Roos, Tessa
    Swartz, Leslie
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [37] A Systematic Review of Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications in Resource-Limited Settings
    Bowry, Ashna D. K.
    Shrank, William H.
    Lee, Joy L.
    Stedman, Margaret
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 (12) : 1479 - 1491
  • [38] A systematic review of measures of medication adherence in consumers with unipolar depression
    Srimongkon, Pornchanok
    Aslani, Parisa
    Chen, Timothy F.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (01): : 3 - 22
  • [39] A Systematic Review of Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications in Resource-Limited Settings
    Ashna D. K. Bowry
    William H. Shrank
    Joy L. Lee
    Margaret Stedman
    Niteesh K. Choudhry
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011, 26 : 1479 - 1491
  • [40] Psychometric properties of problematic exercise measures: a systematic review
    Alcaraz-Ibanez, Manuel
    Paterna, Adrian
    Griffiths, Mark D.
    Sicilia, Alvaro
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022,