Comparing Combination Rules of Pairwise Neural Networks Classifiers

被引:0
|
作者
Olivier Lézoray
Hubert Cardot
机构
[1] Université de Caen,GREYC UMR CNRS 6072
[2] Université Francois-Rabelais de Tours,Laboratoire d’Informatique EA 2101
来源
Neural Processing Letters | 2008年 / 27卷
关键词
Pairwise classifier; Combination; Stacking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A decomposition approach to multiclass classification problems consists in decomposing a multiclass problem into a set of binary ones. Decomposition splits the complete multiclass problem into a set of smaller classification problems involving only two classes (binary classification: dichotomies). With a decomposition, one has to define a recombination which recomposes the outputs of the dichotomizers in order to solve the original multiclass problem. There are several approaches to the decomposition, the most famous ones being one-against-all and one-against-one also called pairwise. In this paper, we focus on pairwise decomposition approach to multiclass classification with neural networks as the base learner for the dichotomies. We are primarily interested in the different possible ways to perform the so-called recombination (or decoding). We review standard methods used to decode the decomposition generated by a one-against-one approach. New decoding methods are proposed and compared to standard methods. A stacking decoding is also proposed which consists in replacing the whole decoding or a part of it by a trainable classifier to arbiter among the conflicting predictions of the pairwise classifiers. Proposed methods try to cope with the main problem while using pairwise decomposition: the use of irrelevant classifiers. Substantial gain is obtained on all datasets used in the experiments. Based on the above, we provide future research directions which consider the recombination problem as an ensemble method.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exact p-values for pairwise comparison of Friedman rank sums, with application to comparing classifiers
    Eisinga, Rob
    Heskes, Tom
    Pelzer, Ben
    Te Grotenhuis, Manfred
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 18
  • [32] Combining multiple classifiers in probabilistic neural networks
    Grim, J
    Kittler, J
    Pudil, P
    Somol, P
    MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, 2000, 1857 : 157 - 166
  • [33] Using Neural Networks as Pipeline Defect Classifiers
    Akram, Nik Ahmad
    Shafiabady, Niusha
    Isa, Dino
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY (ICITCS), 2013,
  • [34] Exact p-values for pairwise comparison of Friedman rank sums, with application to comparing classifiers
    Rob Eisinga
    Tom Heskes
    Ben Pelzer
    Manfred Te Grotenhuis
    BMC Bioinformatics, 18
  • [35] Comparing immune and neural networks
    de Castro, LN
    VII BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 250 - 255
  • [36] Comparing the performance of three neural classifiers for use in embedded applications
    Li, YH
    Pont, MJ
    Parikh, CR
    Jones, NB
    SOFT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, : 34 - 39
  • [37] Improving Alcoholism Diagnosis: Comparing Instance-Based Classifiers Against Neural Networks for Classifying EEG Signal
    Rahman, Shelia
    Sharma, Tanusree
    Mahmud, Mufti
    BRAIN INFORMATICS, BI 2020, 2020, 12241 : 239 - 250
  • [38] Comparing Feature-Based Classifiers and Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Arrhythmia from Short Segments of ECG
    Andreotti, Fernando
    Carr, Oliver
    Pimentel, Marco A. F.
    Mahdi, Adam
    De Vos, Maarten
    2017 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY (CINC), 2017, 44
  • [40] On the Use of Convolutional Neural Networks in Pairwise Language Recognition
    Lozano-Diez, Alicia
    Gonzalez-Dominguez, Javier
    Zazo, Ruben
    Ramos, Daniel
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin
    ADVANCES IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES FOR IBERIAN LANGUAGES, IBERSPEECH 2014, 2014, 8854 : 79 - 88