For-Profit or Not-for-Profit: What Has Affected the Implementation of the Policy for Private Universities in China?

被引:0
|
作者
Xu Liu
Haitao Zhou
Stephen Hunt
Yanli Zhang
机构
[1] Southern University of Science and Technology,Centre for Higher Education Studies
[2] Beijing Normal University,Department of Education
[3] University College London,Institute of Education
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong University,School of Education
来源
Higher Education Policy | 2023年 / 36卷
关键词
Private universities; Policy implementation; For-profit; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Private higher education has become increasingly important in China which has the largest numbers of students enrolled in private universities in the world. The Chinese government, in an attempt to regulate the sector, issued legislation in 2016 which required private universities to classify and register themselves as either for-profit or not-for-profit. However, implementation of the policy is slow and the majority of private universities so far have not re-registered their legal status. This study reports on an empirical investigation of the factors that have affected implementation of the policy through interviews with stakeholders involved in Chinese private HE, and an examination of policy documents. It fills a gap in the English language study of the classification management as for-profit or not-for-profit of private universities. As such, it provides insight into practice for policymakers and academics in the field of governance of private universities.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 212
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The not-for-profit and for-profit arts: Current collaborations and future prospects - Introduction
    Pankratz, DB
    Gibson, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY, 1999, 29 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [32] Survey of hidden costs of dialysis in Italian for-profit and not-for-profit centers
    Bellizzi, Vincenzo
    Perrone, Francesco
    Terracciano, Vincenzo
    Cucciniello, Emanuele
    Stanzione, Giovanna
    D'Angio, Pierluigi
    De Nicola, Luca
    Di Iorio, Biagio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 21 (06) : 894 - 899
  • [33] Uncompensated care provided by for-profit, not-for-profit, and government owned hospitals
    Peter Cram
    Levent Bayman
    Ioana Popescu
    Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
    Xueya Cai
    Gary E Rosenthal
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 10
  • [35] The Effects of Therapist Contracting on For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Medical Billing Behavior
    Bowblis, John R.
    Brunt, Christopher S.
    [J]. NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2017, 46 (06) : 1270 - 1292
  • [36] Mortality risk between for-profit and not-for-profit dialysis providers.
    Collins, AJ
    Weinhandl, ED
    Chen, SC
    Gilbertson, DT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 253A - 253A
  • [37] For-profit versus not-for-profit delivery of long-term care
    McGrail, Kimberlyn M.
    McGregor, Margaret J.
    Cohen, Marcy
    Tate, Robert B.
    Ronald, Lisa A.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2007, 176 (01) : 57 - 58
  • [38] The Effects of Subsidies on Increasing Consumption through For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Newsvendors
    Berenguer, Gemma
    Feng, Qi
    Shanthikumar, Jeyaveerasingam George
    Xu, Lei
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (06) : 1191 - 1206
  • [39] The changing hospital industry: Comparing not-for-profit and for-profit institutions.
    White, WD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2002, 27 (04) : 692 - 696
  • [40] DO FOR-PROFIT AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT NURSING-HOMES BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY
    AARONSON, WE
    ZINN, JS
    ROSKO, MD
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1994, 34 (06): : 775 - 786