Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:0
|
作者
S. Adler
M. Scherrer
K. D. Rückauer
F. D. Daschner
机构
[1] Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology,Department of General Surgery
[2] Freiburg University Hospital,undefined
[3] Freiburg University Hospital,undefined
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Sterilization costs; Disposable instruments; Reusable instruments; Environmental effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 272
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Disposable Versus Reusable Laryngeal Tube Suction for Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Amini, Afshin
    Zand, Farid
    Maghbooli, Masoud
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2010, 60 (01): : 32 - 41
  • [22] A cost comparison between reusable flexible and disposable laryngoscopes
    Ellis, James
    Park, Albert H.
    Prussin, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02)
  • [23] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy
    Singh, Megha
    Mehta, Kuldeep Singh
    Yasir, Mir
    Kaur, Ameet
    Aiman, Aiffa
    Sharma, Akangsha
    Kaur, Neeraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S546 - S550
  • [24] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy
    Megha Singh
    Kuldeep Singh Mehta
    Mir Yasir
    Ameet Kaur
    Aiffa Aiman
    Akangsha Sharma
    Neeraj Kaur
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 546 - 550
  • [25] A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments
    DesCoteaux, JG
    Blackmore, K
    Parsons, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 41 (02) : 136 - +
  • [26] Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    A. Vezakis
    D. Davides
    J. S. Gibson
    M. R. Moore
    H. Shah
    M. Larvin
    M. J. McMahon
    Surgical Endoscopy, 1999, 13 : 890 - 893
  • [27] Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Vezakis, A
    Davides, D
    Gibson, JS
    Moore, MR
    Shah, H
    Larvin, M
    McMahon, MJ
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (09): : 890 - 893
  • [28] Comparison of a New Reusable Gynecologic Laparoscopic Electric Morcellator with a Disposable Morcellator: a Preliminary Trial
    Angeles Martinez-Zamora, M.
    Castelo-Branco, Camil
    Balasch, Juan
    Carmona, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 595 - 598
  • [29] The driving force in trocar insertion - A comparison between disposable and reusable trocars
    Kelty, CJ
    Super, PA
    Stoddard, CJ
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (11): : 1045 - 1046
  • [30] Cholecystectomy in high-risk patients: a comparison between open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Popken, F
    Nassir, F
    Kuchle, R
    Heintz, A
    Junginger, T
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1998, 7 (04) : 353 - 357