Use of C57BL/6N mice on the variety of immunological researches

被引:26
|
作者
Song H.K. [1 ]
Hwang D.Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Microbiology and Immunology, INJE University College of Medicine, 633-165 GaegumDong, BusanjinGu, Busan
[2] Department of Biomaterials Science, College of Natural Resources & Life Science/Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, 50 Cheonghakri, Samnangjin-eup, Miryang, Gyeongnam
关键词
C57BL/6N; C57BL/6NKorl; inbred strain; laboratory animal resources;
D O I
10.5625/lar.2017.33.2.119
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Inbred mice are an essential animal strain for research as they can improve the reproducibility and reliability of study results. The establishment of new inbred lines is continuing, and new inbred lines are being used in many research fields. C57BL/6 is a mouse laboratory animal that has been developed and used as an inbred strain since early stage of mouse strain development, and, in the 1950s, C57BL/6 was separated into substrains by the Jackson Laboratory (C57BL/6J) and the National Institutes of Health (C57BL/6N). C57BL/6 mice have been used in immunology and antitumor activity studies since the early strain development stage. After the mouse genome was fully described, C57BL/6 mice use in many areas of research has expanded. In particular, immunological characteristics such as those related to cellmediated immunity and NK cell activity are relatively higher in C57BL/6 mice than in other mice. The C57BL/6NKorl is a stock of C57BL/6N established as part of a localization of experimental animal strategy of the Korean Food and Drug Administration. Based on analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), C57BL/6NKorl is considered a genetically distinct inbred stock from other C57BL/6N. Various research efforts have been made to describe the characteristics and increase knowledge of the characteristics of C57BL/6Nkorl. The results obtained through these efforts are expected to increase the utilization of C57BL/6Nkorl as a domestic laboratory animal resource and to enhance the reliability of mouse based studies. © 2017, BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains
    Simon, Michelle M.
    Greenaway, Simon
    White, Jacqueline K.
    Fuchs, Helmut
    Gailus-Durner, Valerie
    Wells, Sara
    Sorg, Tania
    Wong, Kim
    Bedu, Elodie
    Cartwright, Elizabeth J.
    Dacquin, Romain
    Djebali, Sophia
    Estabel, Jeanne
    Graw, Jochen
    Ingham, Neil J.
    Jackson, Ian J.
    Lengeling, Andreas
    Mandillo, Silvia
    Marvel, Jacqueline
    Meziane, Hamid
    Preitner, Frederic
    Puk, Oliver
    Roux, Michel
    Adams, David J.
    Atkins, Sarah
    Ayadi, Abdel
    Becker, Lore
    Blake, Andrew
    Brooker, Debra
    Cater, Heather
    Champy, Marie-France
    Combe, Roy
    Danecek, Petr
    di Fenza, Armida
    Gates, Hilary
    Gerdin, Anna-Karin
    Golini, Elisabetta
    Hancock, John M.
    Hans, Wolfgang
    Hoelter, Sabine M.
    Hough, Tertius
    Jurdic, Pierre
    Keane, Thomas M.
    Morgan, Hugh
    Mueller, Werner
    Neff, Frauke
    Nicholson, George
    Pasche, Bastian
    Roberson, Laura-Anne
    Rozman, Jan
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07):
  • [32] Comparative study of fertilization rates of C57BL/6NKorl and C57BL/6N mice obtained from two other sources
    Yun W.B.
    Kim H.R.
    Kim J.E.
    Choi J.Y.
    Lee M.R.
    Park J.J.
    Song B.R.
    Jung Y.S.
    Song H.K.
    Cho J.Y.
    Kim K.S.
    Hwang D.Y.
    Laboratory Animal Research, 2017, 33 (2) : 179 - 186
  • [33] Differences in bone structure and unloading-induced bone loss between C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice
    Sankaran, Jeyantt S.
    Varshney, Manasvi
    Judex, Stefan
    MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2017, 28 (11-12) : 476 - 486
  • [34] C57BL/6N Mice Are More Resistant to Ehrlich Ascites Tumors Than C57BL/6J Mice: The Role of Macrophage Nitric Oxide
    Kalish, Sergey
    Lyamina, Svetlana
    Chausova, Svetlana
    Kochetova, Lada
    Malyshev, Yuri
    Manukhina, Eugenia
    Malyshev, Igor
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR BASIC RESEARCH, 2015, 21 : 235 - 240
  • [35] Differences in bone structure and unloading-induced bone loss between C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice
    Jeyantt S. Sankaran
    Manasvi Varshney
    Stefan Judex
    Mammalian Genome, 2017, 28 : 476 - 486
  • [36] Mylk3 null C57BL/6N mice develop cardiomyopathy, whereas Nnt null C57BL/6J mice do not
    Williams, Jack L.
    Paudyal, Anju
    Awad, Sherine
    Nicholson, James
    Grzesik, Dominika
    Botta, Joaquin
    Meimaridou, Eirini
    Maharaj, Avinaash, V
    Stewart, Michelle
    Tinker, Andrew
    Cox, Roger D.
    Metherell, Lou A.
    LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE, 2020, 3 (04)
  • [37] COMPARED TO C57BL/6J MICE, C57BL/6N MICE EXHIBIT REDUCED ETHANOL CONSUMPTION THAT IS NOT DUE A DISCREPANCY IN SWEET TASTE PERCEPTION
    Erikson, C. M.
    Thuet, T. O.
    Douglas, K. T.
    Rossi, D. J.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 45 : 86A - 87A
  • [38] The Effect of High-Salt Diet on Oxidative Stress Production and Vascular Function in Tff3-/-/C57BL/6N Knockout and Wild Type (C57BL/6N) Mice
    Kozina, Natasa
    Jukic, Ivana
    Mihaljevic, Zrinka
    Matic, Anita
    Dobrivojevic Radmilovic, Marina
    Baric, Anja
    Drenjancevic, Ines
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH, 2024, 61 (05) : 214 - 224
  • [39] Erratum to: Comparative study of fertilization rates of C57Bl/6NKorl and C57BL/6N mice obtained from two other sources
    Woo Bin Yun
    Hye Ryeong Kim
    Ji Eun Kim
    Jun Young Choi
    Mi Rim Lee
    Jin Ju Park
    Bo Ram Song
    Young Suk Jung
    Hyun Keun Song
    Joon Young Cho
    Kil Soo Kim
    Dae Youn Hwang
    Laboratory Animal Research, 2017, 33 (4) : 321 - 321
  • [40] Clinical Chemistry Reference Intervals for C57BL/6J, C57BL/6N, and C3HeB/FeJ Mice (Mus musculus)
    Otto, Gordon P.
    Rathkolb, Birgit
    Oestereicher, Manuela A.
    Lengger, Christoph J.
    Moerth, Corinna
    Micklich, Kateryna
    Fuchs, Helmut
    Gailus-Durner, Valerie
    Wolf, Eckhard
    de Angelis, Martin Hrabe
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 55 (04): : 375 - 386