The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance

被引:0
|
作者
Mireia Hernández
Albert Costa
Glyn W. Humphreys
机构
[1] University of Barcelona,Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology
[2] Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies,undefined
[3] Pompeu Fabra University,undefined
[4] University of Birmingham,undefined
来源
关键词
Work Memory; Attentional Capture; Valid Trial; Search Display; Invalid Trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We ask whether attentional guidance from working memory (WM) is influenced by the size of an attentional window. Participants adopted either a focused or a diffuse attentional window when responding to a search display. Prior to the search display an initial cue had to be held in memory (Experiment 1A, visual WM; Experiment 1C, verbal WM) or merely identified (Experiment 1B, identification). In all cases, search performance was affected by the re-presentation of the cue in the search display, with the cuing effects (either cost or benefit) being larger when the cue was held in memory than when it was merely identified. Critically, the magnitude of the cuing benefit increased when participants adopted a diffuse attentional window. This held for effects that are based on items held in WM and for effects that are based only on item priming. The results suggest that variations in the size of an attentional window modulate top-down (both WM conditions) as well as bottom-up guidance of attention (identification condition).
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 972
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention
    Schwark, Jeremy D.
    Dolgov, Igor
    Sandry, Joshua
    Volkman, C. Brooks
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 144 (02) : 269 - 278
  • [42] Attentional Guidance by Simultaneously Active Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Competition in Saccade Target Selection
    Beck, Valerie
    Hollingworth, Andrew
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 284 - 285
  • [43] Hold it! Memory affects attentional dwell time
    Emily L. Parks
    Joseph B. Hopfinger
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2008, 15 : 1128 - 1134
  • [44] Hold it! Memory affects attentional dwell time
    Parks, Emily L.
    Hopfinger, Joseph B.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (06) : 1128 - 1134
  • [45] On the difference between working memory and attentional set
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    Eimer, Martin
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) : 1553 - 1558
  • [46] Attentional Orienting in Working Memory in Children with ADHD
    Superbia-Guimaraes, Luisa
    Bader, Michel
    Camos, Valerie
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 47 (08) : 384 - 400
  • [47] The role of working memory in the attentional control of pain
    Legrain, Valery
    Crombez, Geert
    Verhoeven, Katrien
    Mouraux, Andre
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (02) : 453 - 459
  • [48] Attentional priority determines working memory precision
    Klyszejko, Zuzanna
    Rahmati, Masih
    Curtis, Clayton E.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2014, 105 : 70 - 76
  • [49] Attentional determinants of visual working memory capacity
    Al-Aidroos, Naseem
    Pratt, Jay
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2009, 63 (04): : 343 - 343
  • [50] Role of Attentional Tags in Working Memory-Driven Attentional Capture
    Kuo, Chun-Yu
    Chao, Hsuan-Fu
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (04) : 1301 - 1307