Exploring the Effects of Perceptual Separability on Human-Automation Team Efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
Scott-Sharoni S.T. [1 ]
Yamani Y. [1 ]
Kneeland C.M. [2 ]
Long S.K. [1 ]
Chen J. [1 ]
Houpt J.W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
[2] Wright State University, Dayton, OH
[3] University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Display design; Human-automation interaction; Perceptual separability; Systems factorial technology;
D O I
10.1007/s42113-021-00108-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the current experiment was to examine the effect of perceptual separability on human-automation team efficiency in a speeded judgment task. Human operators in applied environments interact with automated systems via a visual display which contain both complex raw data and automated support, requiring both sources of information to be mentally integrated by operators. Participants performed a speeded length-judgment task with or without decisional cues issued by a reliable automated aid. The cue was rendered in the format perceptually separable (color) or configural (area) to raw stimulus information (length). Workload capacity measures quantified human-automation team efficiency. Participants responded more slowly following the onset of the aid’s decisional cue in the area display format in the form of limited-capacity processing than the color display format, which led to unlimited-capacity processing. The color display format can support unlimited-capacity processing without moderating operators’ response speed while the area display format may produce limited-capacity processing, delaying their responses. Automation and display designers should consider utilizing separable perceptual characteristics of display elements in visual interfaces to improve human-automation team efficiency in a speeded perceptual-cognitive task. © 2021, Society for Mathematical Psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces
    Kunze, Alexander
    Summerskill, Stephen J.
    Marshall, Russell
    Filtness, Ashleigh J.
    ERGONOMICS, 2019, 62 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [32] A human-automation interface model to guide automation design of system functions
    Kennedy, Joshua S.
    McCauley, Michael E.
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2007, 119 (01) : 109 - 124
  • [33] Effects of trust in human-automation shared control: A human-in-the-loop driving simulation study
    Yin, Weiru
    Chai, Chen
    Zhou, Ziyao
    Li, Chenhao
    Lu, Yali
    Shi, Xiupeng
    2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, : 1147 - 1154
  • [34] The Activated Failures of Human-Automation Interactions on the Flight Deck
    Li, Wen-Chin
    Greaves, Matthew
    Durando, Davide
    Lin, John J. H.
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2016, 48 (03): : 163 - 171
  • [35] Using PPT to Analyze Suboptimal Human-Automation Performance
    Rice, Stephen
    Trafimow, David
    Hunt, Gayle
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 137 (03): : 310 - 329
  • [36] Investigation on the impact of human-automation interaction in maritime operations
    Pazouki, Kayvan
    Forbes, Neil
    Norman, Rosemary A.
    Woodward, Michael D.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 153 : 297 - 304
  • [37] Human-Automation Interaction Research: Past, Present, and Future
    Hancock, Peter A.
    Jagacinski, Richard J.
    Parasuraman, Raja
    Wickens, Christopher D.
    Wilson, Glenn F.
    Kaber, David B.
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2013, 21 (02) : 9 - 14
  • [38] Checking formal verification models for human-automation interaction
    van Paassen, M. M.
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Jimenez, Noelia
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2014, : 3709 - 3714
  • [39] A systematic approach to predict performance of human-automation systems
    Howard, Ayarma M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2007, 37 (04): : 594 - 601
  • [40] USING NEURAL NETWORKS TO ASSESS HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION
    Sullivan, Katlyn B.
    Feigh, Karen M.
    Durso, Francis T.
    Fischer, Ute
    Pop, Vlad L.
    Mosier, Kathleen
    Blosch, Justin
    Morrow, Dan
    2011 IEEE/AIAA 30TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2011,