Exploring the Effects of Perceptual Separability on Human-Automation Team Efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
Scott-Sharoni S.T. [1 ]
Yamani Y. [1 ]
Kneeland C.M. [2 ]
Long S.K. [1 ]
Chen J. [1 ]
Houpt J.W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
[2] Wright State University, Dayton, OH
[3] University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Display design; Human-automation interaction; Perceptual separability; Systems factorial technology;
D O I
10.1007/s42113-021-00108-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the current experiment was to examine the effect of perceptual separability on human-automation team efficiency in a speeded judgment task. Human operators in applied environments interact with automated systems via a visual display which contain both complex raw data and automated support, requiring both sources of information to be mentally integrated by operators. Participants performed a speeded length-judgment task with or without decisional cues issued by a reliable automated aid. The cue was rendered in the format perceptually separable (color) or configural (area) to raw stimulus information (length). Workload capacity measures quantified human-automation team efficiency. Participants responded more slowly following the onset of the aid’s decisional cue in the area display format in the form of limited-capacity processing than the color display format, which led to unlimited-capacity processing. The color display format can support unlimited-capacity processing without moderating operators’ response speed while the area display format may produce limited-capacity processing, delaying their responses. Automation and display designers should consider utilizing separable perceptual characteristics of display elements in visual interfaces to improve human-automation team efficiency in a speeded perceptual-cognitive task. © 2021, Society for Mathematical Psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PREDICTING THE EFFECTS OF AUTOMATION RELIABILITY RATES ON HUMAN-AUTOMATION TEAM PERFORMANCE
    Hillesheim, Anthony J.
    Rusnock, Christina F.
    2016 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2016, : 1802 - 1813
  • [2] Team Communication Behaviors of the Human-Automation Teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), 2016, : 28 - 34
  • [3] Exploring Relationships of Human-Automation Interaction Consequences on Pilots: Uncovering Subsystems
    Durso, Francis T.
    Stearman, Eric J.
    Morrow, Daniel G.
    Mosier, Kathleen L.
    Fischer, Ute
    Pop, Vlad L.
    Feigh, Karen M.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2015, 57 (03) : 397 - 406
  • [4] Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments
    Cuevas, Haydee M.
    Fiore, Stephen M.
    Caldwell, Barrett S.
    Strater, Laura
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2007, 78 (05): : B63 - B70
  • [5] Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: The Forefront of Human-Automation Teaming
    Calhoun, Gloria
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 64 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [6] Special issue on human-automation coagency
    Inagaki, T.
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2012, 14 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [7] Formal verification of human-automation interaction
    Degani, A
    Heymann, M
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (01) : 28 - 43
  • [8] Measuring Human-Automation Function Allocation
    Pritchett, Amy R.
    Kim, So Young
    Feigh, Karen M.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 8 (01) : 52 - 77
  • [9] History and future of human-automation interaction
    Janssen, Christian P.
    Donker, Stella F.
    Brumby, Duncan P.
    Kun, Andrew L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2019, 131 : 99 - 107
  • [10] Decision Referrals in Human-Automation Teams
    Kaza, Kesav
    Le Ny, Jerome
    Mahajan, Aditya
    2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 2842 - 2847