Resistance mechanisms and risk assessment regarding indoxacarb in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua

被引:0
|
作者
Ming Gao
Wei Mu
Wei Wang
Chao Zhou
Xiuhuan Li
机构
[1] Shandong Agricultural University,Academy of Plant Protection
来源
Phytoparasitica | 2014年 / 42卷
关键词
Enzyme assay; Indoxacarb; Realized heritability; Sodium channel; Synergist;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a worldwide polyphagous pest with a strong ability to develop resistance. After 12 generations of selection by indoxacarb, a resistant strain (RR-indox) was obtained with a 240.04-fold resistance ratio compared with the susceptible strain (WH-SS), which was derived from the Wuhan Institute of Vegetable Science. The LC50 for the susceptible strain was 0.23 mg l-1 and it increased to 55.21 mg l-1 after 12 selected generations. The estimated realized heritability (h2) of the RR-indox strain was 0.25. The number of generations required for a 100-fold increase in LC50 was estimated to be nine under the 90% lethal dose. The inhibitors piperonyl butoxide (PBO), triphenyl phosphate (TPP), and diethylmeleate (DEM) had synergistic ratios of 0.87-, 0.31- and 0.36-fold in RR-indox, and 0.51-, 0.09- and 0.12-fold in WH-SS, respectively. A 3.75-fold increased level of activity of glutathione S-transferase was found in RR-indox compared with WH-SS, whereas a 1.99-fold higher activity level of carboxylesterase was observed. No significant differences in the cuticular penetration rate were found between RR-indox and WH-SS. A DNA fragment of 257 bp length of the IIS6 region of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene was amplified and sequenced from both RR-indox and WH-SS. An amino acid substitution from leucine (CTT) in WH-SS to phenylalanine (TTT) in RR-indox was observed at site 1014. These results show the resistance mechanisms of S. exigua to indoxacarb to be associated with glutathione S-transferase, carboxylesterase and a Leu-1014-Phe mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 594
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] KARYOTYPE OF BEET ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA-EXIGUA (LEPIDOPTERA-NOCTUIDAE)
    DONG, N
    EMMEL, TC
    ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 68 (03) : 591 - 592
  • [22] Egg and larval parasitoids of the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua on maize in Turkey
    Sertkaya, E
    Bayram, A
    Kornosor, S
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2004, 32 (03) : 305 - 312
  • [23] SEX-PHEROMONE COMPONENTS OF THE BEET ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA-EXIGUA
    TUMLINSON, JH
    MITCHELL, ER
    SONNET, PE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING & TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE CONTROL, 1981, 16 (02): : 189 - 200
  • [24] Lysozyme of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua:: activity induction and cDNA structure
    Bae, S
    Kim, Y
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 135 (03): : 511 - 519
  • [25] Effects of chlorantraniliprole on development and reproduction of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hubner)
    Lai, Tiancai
    Su, Jianya
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2011, 84 (03) : 381 - 386
  • [26] PATHOGENICITY OF A NUCLEAR-POLYHEDROSIS VIRUS OF BEET ARMYWORM SPODOPTERA EXIGUA
    HUNTER, DK
    HALL, IM
    JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY, 1968, 12 (01) : 83 - &
  • [27] Identification and functional analysis of gut dsRNases in the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua
    Li, Jiangjie
    Shi, Yan
    Xue, Qi
    Smagghe, Guy
    De Schutter, Kristof
    Taning, Clauvis Nji Tizi
    INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2024, 175
  • [29] Gossypol-induced fitness gain and increased resistance to deltamethrin in beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hubner)
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Liu, Sisi
    Jan, Saad
    Ali, Bahar
    Shahid, Muhammad
    Fernandez-Grandon, G. Mandela
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Ahmad, Aqeel
    Wang, Mo
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 75 (03) : 683 - 693
  • [30] Weather based prediction model for beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hubner) in chickpea
    Kamakshi, N.
    Sagar, D.
    Jayalakshmi, V.
    Chander, S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (01): : 84 - 88