Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Stefan Leucht
Anna Chaimani
Dimitris Mavridis
Claudia Leucht
Maximilian Huhn
Bartosz Helfer
Myrto Samara
Andrea Cipriani
John R. Geddes
John M. Davis
机构
[1] Technische Universität München,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
[2] Paris Descartes University,INSERM, UMR1153 Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), METHODS Team
[3] University Campus Ioannina,Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina School of Education
[4] Paris Descartes University,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine
[5] Imperial College London,Department of Medicine
[6] University of Oxford,Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital
[7] Warneford Hospital,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
[8] University of Illinois at Chicago (mc 912),Psychiatric Institute
[9] Maryland Psychiatric Research Center,undefined
来源
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2019年 / 44卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Differences in efficacy between antipsychotics and placebo in schizophrenia trials have decreased over the past decades. Previous studies have tried to identify potential explanatory factors focusing on response to placebo; however, it is still not clear which factors, if any, specifically moderate drug-response, as they may be different from those moderating placebo-response. Therefore, in this meta-regression analysis we explore whether there is an interaction between drug-response and placebo-response in terms of effect size. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the US Food and Drug Administration website for randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of antipsychotics in patients with acute schizophrenia (last update: October 2016). The main outcome was the change on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score from baseline to endpoint after at least 3 weeks of treatment. Multiple patient-, design-, and drug-related potential predictors of response were analyzed by meta-regressions, as predefined in the study protocol. Overall, 167 trials with 28,102 participants were included. Publication year, the number of participants and sites, mean dose, minimum severity threshold as an inclusion criterion, chronicity, industry sponsorship, type of rating scale, diagnostic criteria, and number of medications had a different impact on drug and placebo response. By contrast, baseline severity, duration of wash-out, study duration, and study region affected drug and placebo response in a similar way without a net effect on effect sizes. No other factors had a significant effect on either drug-response or placebo-response. In conclusion, as individual moderators may have different impact on placebo-response and drug-response, it is important to consider also the specific factors influencing drug-response in order to fully understand the difference between antipsychotics and placebo. These results shed further light on the phenomenon of decreasing effect size of antipsychotics for schizophrenia over time and should help design future randomized controlled trials in the field (Prospero registration number CRD42013003342).
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1966
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effect of the Acute-Phase Response on In Vitro Drug Metabolism and Plasma Protein Binding in the Horse
    P.C. Mills
    J.C. Ng
    D.E. Auer
    Veterinary Research Communications, 1997, 21 : 361 - 368
  • [42] Blood pressure response to magnesium intake in population subgroups: Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials
    Geleijnse, JM
    Kok, FJ
    Grobbee, DE
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 : S316 - S316
  • [43] Effectiveness of Acute-Phase Treatment of Depression Is Not Influenced by Comorbid Personality Disorders: Results from a Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
    van Bronswijk, Suzanne C.
    Koster, Eva Maria
    Peeters, Frenk P. M. L.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2020, 89 (02) : 109 - 110
  • [44] Placebo Response in Antipsychotic Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis (vol 71, pg 1409, 2014)
    Rutherford, Bret R.
    JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 72 (01) : 96 - 96
  • [45] Placebo Response and Its Predictors in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Meta-Regression and MetaForest
    Castells, Xavier
    Saez, Marc
    Barcheni, Maghie
    Cunill, Ruth
    Serrano, Domenec
    Lopez, Beatriz
    van Lissa, Caspar J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 25 (01): : 26 - 35
  • [46] Placebo-controlled pharmacological trials in child and adolescents with bipolar disorder manic episode (BPD-ME): Systematic review, meta-analysis and a meta-regression on placebo response
    Ciray, Remzi Ogulcan
    Hancer, Pelin
    Tuncturk, Mustafa
    Emiroglu, Neslihan Inal
    KLINIK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 23 (03): : 375 - 385
  • [47] Nocebo Response in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of 105 Randomized Clinical Trials
    Ramirez-Saco, David
    Barcheni, Maghie
    Cunill, Ruth
    Saez, Marc
    Farre, Magi
    Castells, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2022, 26 (11) : 1412 - 1421
  • [48] Risk of death with atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for dementia - Meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Schneider, LS
    Dagerman, KS
    Insel, P
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (15): : 1934 - 1943
  • [49] Quality of Reporting of Malaria Trials during Pregnancy and Its Impact on the Effectiveness of Antimalarial Drug: A Subgroup and a Meta-Regression Analysis
    Muanda, F. T. M.
    Berard, A. B.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2015, 103 (05) : 413 - 413
  • [50] A meta-analysis of the placebo response in acute migraine and how this response may be influenced by some of the characteristics of clinical trials
    Macedo, A
    Farré, M
    Baños, JE
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 62 (03) : 161 - 172