Global variation of soil microbial carbon-use efficiency in relation to growth temperature and substrate supply

被引:0
|
作者
Yang Qiao
Jing Wang
Guopeng Liang
Zhenggang Du
Jian Zhou
Chen Zhu
Kun Huang
Xuhui Zhou
Yiqi Luo
Liming Yan
Jianyang Xia
机构
[1] East China Normal University,Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences
[2] Northern Arizona University,Center for Ecosystem Science and Society
[3] Arizona,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil microbial carbon-use efficiency (CUE), which is defined as the ratio of growth over C uptake, is commonly assumed as a constant or estimated by a temperature-dependent function in current microbial-explicit soil carbon (C) models. The temperature-dependent function (i.e., CUE = CUE0 + m × (T − 20)) simulates the dynamic CUE based on the specific CUE at a given reference temperature (i.e., CUE0) and a temperature response coefficient (i.e., m). Here, based on 780 observations from 98 sites, we showed a divergent spatial distribution of the soil microbial CUE (0.5 ± 0.25; mean ± SD) at the global scale. Then, the key parameters CUE0 and m in the above equation were estimated as 0.475 and −0.016, respectively, based on the observations with the Markov chain Monte Carlo technique. We also found a strong dependence of microbial CUE on the type of C substrate. The multiple regression analysis showed that glucose influences the variation of measured CUE associated with the environmental factors. Overall, this study confirms the global divergence of soil microbial CUE and calls for the incorporation of C substrate beside temperature in estimating the microbial CUE in different biomes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does declining carbon-use efficiency explain thermal acclimation of soil respiration with warming?
    Tucker, Colin L.
    Bell, Jennifer
    Pendall, Elise
    Ogle, Kiona
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (01) : 252 - 263
  • [22] The variation of soil microbial respiration with depth in relation to soil carbon composition
    Fang, CM
    Moncrieff, JB
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2005, 268 (1-2) : 243 - 253
  • [23] The variation of soil microbial respiration with depth in relation to soil carbon composition
    Changming Fang
    John B. Moncrieff
    Plant and Soil, 2005, 268 : 243 - 253
  • [24] Microbial Growth and Carbon Use Efficiency in the Rhizosphere and Root-Free Soil
    Blagodatskaya, Evgenia
    Blagodatsky, Sergey
    Anderson, Traute-Heidi
    Kuzyakov, Yakov
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [25] Differences in the soil microbial community and carbon-use efficiency following development of Vochysia guatemalensis tree plantations in unproductive pastures in Costa Rica
    Eaton, William D.
    McGee, Katie M.
    Donnelly, Robert
    Lemenze, Alex
    Karas, Olivia
    Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2019, 27 (06) : 1263 - 1273
  • [26] Effect of different decay classes of Eucalyptus stump substrates on microbial resource limitation and carbon-use efficiency
    Xiangsheng Deng
    Fei Cheng
    Mingman Li
    Peng He
    Lu Shen
    Haiyu Liu
    Plant and Soil, 2022, 478 : 651 - 669
  • [27] Rethinking microbial carbon use efficiency in soil models
    Allison, Steven D.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2025, 15 (01) : 10 - 12
  • [28] Linkage between Leaf-Litter-Soil, Microbial Resource Limitation, and Carbon-Use Efficiency in Successive Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) Plantations
    Shen, Lu
    Ye, Shaoming
    Liu, Haiyu
    Deng, Xiangsheng
    He, Peng
    Cheng, Fei
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [29] Effect of different decay classes of Eucalyptus stump substrates on microbial resource limitation and carbon-use efficiency
    Deng, Xiangsheng
    Cheng, Fei
    Li, Mingman
    He, Peng
    Shen, Lu
    Liu, Haiyu
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2022, 478 (1-2) : 651 - 669
  • [30] Soil microbial carbon use efficiency differs between mycorrhizal trees: insights from substrate stoichiometry and microbial networks
    Yu, Jing
    Yang, Jingyi
    Qu, Lingrui
    Huang, Xiaoyi
    Liu, Yue
    Jiang, Ping
    Wang, Chao
    ISME COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 5 (01):