Leveraging EHR Data for Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Frank J. Manion
Marcelline R. Harris
Ayse G. Buyuktur
Patricia M. Clark
Lawrence C. An
David A. Hanauer
机构
[1] University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center,
[2] University of Michigan School of Nursing,undefined
[3] University of Michigan School of Information,undefined
[4] University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
[5] University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
[6] University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Current Oncology Reports | 2012年 / 14卷
关键词
Data sharing; Comparative effectiveness research; Outcomes research; Clinical informatics; Common data elements; Semantic interoperability; Electronic health records;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Along with the increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) are expectations that data collected within EHRs will be readily available for outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Yet the ability to effectively share and reuse data depends on implementing and configuring EHRs with these goals in mind from the beginning. Data sharing and integration must be planned both locally as well as nationally. The rich data transmission and semantic infrastructure developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for research provides an excellent example of moving beyond paper-based paradigms and exploiting the power of semantically robust, network-based systems, and engaging both domain and informatics expertise. Similar efforts are required to address current challenges in sharing EHR data.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 501
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Leveraging the power of pooled data for cancer outcomes research
    Hugh-Yeun, Kiara
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 35 : 74
  • [22] Imaging and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER): Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital
    Jalbert, Jessica J.
    Gerhard-Herman, Marie D.
    Rothman, Andrew T.
    Williams, Lauren A.
    Chen, Chih-Ying
    Liu, Jun
    Seeger, John D.
    Nguyen, Louis L.
    Setoguchi, Soko
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 30 - 31
  • [23] Causal Inference in Oncology Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Observational Data: Are Instrumental Variables Underutilized?
    Perraillon, Marcelo Coca
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (13) : 2319 - +
  • [24] Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research
    Meyer, Anne-Marie
    Carpenter, William R.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Stuermer, Til
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2012, 118 (21) : 5186 - 5197
  • [25] Comparative Effectiveness Research and Outcomes of Diabetes Treatment
    Safford, Monika M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (22): : 2275 - 2276
  • [26] Cost, Coverage, and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Critical Issues for Oncology
    Pearson, Steven D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) : 4275 - 4281
  • [27] Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology: The Need for Clarity, Transparency and Vision
    Lyman, Gary H.
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2009, 27 (06) : 593 - 597
  • [28] Use of Retrospective Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research Yields Mixed Outcomes and Should be Avoided
    Zaorsky, N. G.
    Wang, X.
    Lehrer, E. J.
    Tchelebi, L.
    Yeich, A.
    Prasad, V.
    Chinchilli, V. M.
    Wang, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E357 - E357
  • [29] Systematic Review of Comparative Effectiveness Data for Oncology Orphan Drugs
    Cheng, Mindy M.
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Devine, Emily Beth
    Garrison, Louis P.
    Bresnahan, Brian W.
    Veenstra, David L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2012, 18 (01): : 47 - 62
  • [30] THE ROLE OF RX DATA IN COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
    Varasteh, L.
    Pedan, A.
    Asumeng-Denteh, E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A487 - A487