Computation of exact confidence limits from discrete data

被引:0
|
作者
Paul Kabaila
机构
[1] La Trobe University,Department of Statistical Science
来源
Computational Statistics | 2005年 / 20卷
关键词
Confidence upper limit; Biostatistics; Reliability; Discrete data; Nuisance parameter;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Suppose that the data have a discrete distribution determined by (∞, ψ) where θ is the scalar parameter of interest and ψ is a nuisance parameter vector. The Buehler 1 - α upper confidence limit for θ is as small as possible, subject to the constraints that (a) its coverage probability is at least 1 - α and (b) it is a nondecreasing function of a pre-specified statisticT. This confidence limit has important biostatistical and reliability applications. The main result of the paper is that for a wide class of models (including binomial and Poisson), parameters of interest 9 and statisticsT (which possess what we call the “logical ordering” property) there is a dramatic increase in the ease with which this upper confidence limit can be computed. This result is illustrated numerically for θ a difference of binomial probabilities. Kabaila & Lloyd (2002) also show that ifT is poorly chosen then an assumption required for the validity of the formula for this confidence limit may not be satisfied. We show that for binomial data this assumption must be satisfied whenT possesses the “logical ordering” property.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 414
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exact confidence limits for proportion difference in clinical trials with bilateral outcome
    Guogen Shan
    [J]. Statistical Methods & Applications, 2020, 29 : 515 - 525
  • [42] Comparison of 'tail method' exact confidence limits for the difference of binomial probabilities
    Kabaila, P.
    [J]. ACTA APPLICANDAE MATHEMATICAE, 2007, 96 (1-3) : 283 - 291
  • [43] Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs
    Shan, Guogen
    [J]. STATISTICS, 2018, 52 (05) : 1086 - 1095
  • [44] EXACT CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR BINOMIAL PROPORTIONS - PEARSON AND HARTLEY REVISITED
    BRENNER, DJ
    QUAN, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1990, 39 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [45] Comparison of ‘Tail Method’ Exact Confidence Limits for the Difference of Binomial Probabilities
    P. Kabaila
    [J]. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 2007, 96 : 283 - 291
  • [46] Exact confidence limits for covariate-dependent risk in cultivar trials
    Piepho, HP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2000, 5 (02) : 202 - 213
  • [47] EXACT CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR BINOMIAL PROPORTIONS - BRENNER AND QUAN REVISITED
    COPAS, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1992, 41 (05) : 569 - 572
  • [48] Correlation confidence limits for unevenly sampled data
    Roberts, Jason
    Curran, Mark
    Poynter, Samuel
    Moy, Andrew
    van Ommen, Tas
    Vance, Tessa
    Tozer, Carly
    Graham, Felicity S.
    Young, Duncan A.
    Plummer, Christopher
    Pedro, Joel
    Blankenship, Donald
    Siegert, Martin
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 104 : 120 - 124
  • [49] Exact computation in numerical linear algebra: The discrete fourier transform
    Anderson, JADW
    Sweby, PK
    [J]. GODUNOV METHODS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 61 - 67
  • [50] Limits of the Discrete Fourier Transform in Exact Identifying of the Vibrations Frequency
    Chioncel, Cristian Paul
    Gillich, Nicoleta
    Tirian, Gelu Ovidiu
    Ntakpe, Jean Louis
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION, 2015, 12 (01): : 16 - 19