Rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic monotherapy in 2-year seizure-free adult patients with epilepsy (RASLOW) study: a pragmatic multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Sara Gasparini
Edoardo Ferlazzo
Giorgia Giussani
Domenico Italiano
Vittoria Cianci
Chiara Sueri
Edoardo Spina
Ettore Beghi
Umberto Aguglia
机构
[1] Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro,Regional Epilepsy Center, Presidio Riuniti
[2] IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”,Laboratory of Neurological Disorders
[3] University of Messina,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2016年 / 37卷
关键词
Slow withdrawal; Rapid withdrawal; Anti epileptic drug; Randomized controlled trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Antiepileptic drug withdrawal may be an option for patients who have been seizure free for some years. The best withdrawal rate is questionable; in particular, it is unknown whether “rapid” withdrawal is associated with a higher risk of relapse as compared to “slow” withdrawal. We aim to establish if a slow or a rapid withdrawal schedule of antiepileptic monotherapy influences relapse rate in adult patients with focal or generalized epilepsy who have been seizure free for at least 2 years. This multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled study will enroll adult patients with focal or generalized epilepsy, who are seizure free on monotherapy. Patients will be randomized to a slow (160 days) or a rapid (60 days) schedule. Follow-up will last 1 year after randomization. The primary endpoint is the time to seizure relapse; secondary endpoints are compliance to the assigned schedule, occurrence of status epilepticus, of seizure-related injuries and mortality. A sample size of 350 patients has been planned. Univariate and multivariate analysis by Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression (primary endpoint) and by logistic regression (secondary endpoint) will be performed. The present study should contribute to better define the best withdrawal period for AED treatment in adult patients with epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 583
页数:4
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [22] ACL Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Versus Double-Stranded Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Mo, Ingunn Fleten
    Harlem, Thomas
    Faleide, Anne Gro Heyn
    Strand, Torbjorn
    Vindfeld, Soren
    Solheim, Eirik
    Inderhaug, Eivind
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (08): : 1927 - 1936
  • [23] Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): A prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up
    Brox, JI
    Gjengedal, E
    Uppheim, G
    Bohmer, AS
    Brevik, JI
    Ljunggren, AE
    Staff, PH
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1999, 8 (02) : 102 - 111
  • [24] Alogliptin versus glipizide monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild hyperglycaemia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, 1-year study
    Rosenstock, J.
    Wilson, C.
    Fleck, P.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2013, 15 (10): : 906 - 914
  • [25] Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up
    Nemoto O.
    Kitada A.
    Naitou S.
    Tachibana A.
    Ito Y.
    Fujikawa A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (Suppl 1) : 127 - 134
  • [26] The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion—a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study
    Jarle Sundseth
    Oddrun Anita Fredriksli
    Frode Kolstad
    Lars Gunnar Johnsen
    Are Hugo Pripp
    Hege Andresen
    Erling Myrseth
    Kay Müller
    Øystein P. Nygaard
    John-Anker Zwart
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 1225 - 1235
  • [27] Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus a Transforaminal Approach A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study With 2-Year Follow Up
    Nie, Hongfei
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    Song, Yueming
    Chen, Guo
    Wang, Xiandi
    Li, Zhuhai
    Jiang, Hushan
    Kong, Qingquan
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (19B) : B30 - B37
  • [28] Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: Results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up
    Harilainen, A
    Sandelin, J
    Jansson, KA
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (01): : 25 - 33
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus metformin uptitration in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized, open-label, prospective study (VISION)
    Ji, L-N
    Pan, C-Y
    Lu, J-M
    Li, H.
    Zhu, D-L
    Li, Q.
    Li, Q-F
    Peng, Y-D
    Tian, H-M
    Yao, C.
    Zhao, Z-G
    Wang, L.
    Wang, B-H
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (08): : 775 - 782
  • [30] The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study
    Sundseth, Jarle
    Fredriksli, Oddrun Anita
    Kolstad, Frode
    Johnsen, Lars Gunnar
    Pripp, Are Hugo
    Andresen, Hege
    Myrseth, Erling
    Mueller, Kay
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Zwart, John-Anker
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (04) : 1225 - 1235