Inverse design methods for indoor ventilation systems using CFD-based multi-objective genetic algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Zhiqiang John Zhai
Yu Xue
Qingyan Chen
机构
[1] Tianjin University,School of Environmental Science and Engineering
[2] University of Colorado at Boulder,School of Mechanical Engineering
[3] Purdue University,undefined
来源
Building Simulation | 2014年 / 7卷
关键词
inverse modeling; multi-objective genetic algorithm; computational fluid dynamics; predicted mean vote; percent dissatisfied; age of air;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conventional designers typically count on thermal equilibrium and require ventilation rates of a space to design ventilation systems for the space. This design, however, may not provide a conformable and healthy micro-environment for each occupant due to the non-uniformity in airflow, temperature and ventilation effectiveness as well as potential conflicts in thermal comfort, indoor air quality (IAQ) and energy consumption. This study proposes two new design methods: the constraint method and the optimization method, by using advanced simulation techniques—computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA). Using predicted mean vote (PMV), percentage dissatisfied of draft (PD) and age of air around occupants as the design goals, the simulations predict the performance curves for the three indices that can thus determine the optimal solutions. A simple 2D office and a 3D aircraft cabin were evaluated, as demonstrations, which reveal both methods have superior performance in system design. The optimization method provides more accurate results while the constraint method needs less computation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CFD-based multi-objective optimization of the duct for a rim-driven thruster
    Zhai, Shuo
    Jin, Shuanbao
    Chen, Junquan
    Liu, Zhihua
    Song, Xiliang
    Ocean Engineering, 2022, 264
  • [22] A Hybrid Multi-objective Algorithm Using Genetic and Estimation of Distribution Based on Design of Experiments
    Dai, Guangming
    Wang, Jianwen
    Zhu, Jiankai
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 2009, : 284 - 288
  • [23] Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Truck Deflector Using Genetic Algorithm and CFD Method
    Zhao Xu
    Han Tianshi
    Yang Qiuping
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1 AND 2, 2010, : 432 - 434
  • [24] Multi-objective optimization of the cascade parameters of a torque converter based on CFD and a genetic algorithm
    Ran, Zilin
    Ma, Wenxing
    Liu, Chunbao
    Li, Jing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2021, 235 (08) : 2311 - 2323
  • [25] Multi-objective optimal design of sandwich panels using a genetic algorithm
    Xu, Xiaomei
    Jiang, Yiping
    Lee, Heow Pueh
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 49 (10) : 1665 - 1684
  • [26] Multi-objective optimization design of Screw conveyor using Genetic Algorithm
    Wang Duanyi
    THERMAL, POWER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 732-733 : 402 - 406
  • [27] Design analysis of polymer filtration using a multi-objective genetic algorithm
    Fowler, K. R.
    Jenkins, E. W.
    Cox, C. L.
    McClune, B.
    Seyfzadeh, B.
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 43 (04) : 710 - 726
  • [28] Design optimization of Stewart platform for motion simulation systems using multi-objective genetic algorithm
    Thanh Vu-Tien
    Hung Cu-Xuan
    2019 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2019, : 436 - 440
  • [29] Inverse design optimization of transonic wings based on multi-objective genetic algorithms
    Takahashi, S
    Obayashi, S
    Nakahashi, K
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1999, 37 (12) : 1656 - 1662
  • [30] Design optimization of a runflat structure based on multi-objective genetic algorithm
    Zhou, Guan
    Ma, Zheng-Dong
    Cheng, Aiguo
    Li, Guangyao
    Huang, Jin
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 51 (06) : 1363 - 1371