Regional geoid computation by least squares modified Hotine’s formula with additive corrections

被引:0
|
作者
Silja Märdla
Artu Ellmann
Jonas Ågren
Lars E. Sjöberg
机构
[1] Tallinn University of Technology,
[2] Lantmäteriet,undefined
[3] The Swedish Mapping,undefined
[4] Cadastral and Land Registration Authority,undefined
[5] KTH,undefined
[6] Royal Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2018年 / 92卷
关键词
Geoid; Gravity anomaly; Gravity disturbance; Hotine; Quasigeoid; Stokes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geoid and quasigeoid modelling from gravity anomalies by the method of least squares modification of Stokes’s formula with additive corrections is adapted for the usage with gravity disturbances and Hotine’s formula. The biased, unbiased and optimum versions of least squares modification are considered. Equations are presented for the four additive corrections that account for the combined (direct plus indirect) effect of downward continuation (DWC), topographic, atmospheric and ellipsoidal corrections in geoid or quasigeoid modelling. The geoid or quasigeoid modelling scheme by the least squares modified Hotine formula is numerically verified, analysed and compared to the Stokes counterpart in a heterogeneous study area. The resulting geoid models and the additive corrections computed both for use with Stokes’s or Hotine’s formula differ most in high topography areas. Over the study area (reaching almost 2 km in altitude), the approximate geoid models (before the additive corrections) differ by 7 mm on average with a 3 mm standard deviation (SD) and a maximum of 1.3 cm. The additive corrections, out of which only the DWC correction has a numerically significant difference, improve the agreement between respective geoid or quasigeoid models to an average difference of 5 mm with a 1 mm SD and a maximum of 8 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 270
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] High-resolution regional geoid computation without applying Stokes's formula: a case study of the Iranian geoid
    Ardalan, AA
    Grafarend, EW
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2004, 78 (1-2) : 138 - 156
  • [22] The optimization of marine geoid model from altimetry data using Least Squares Stokes modification approach with additive corrections across Malaysia
    Yazid, Nornajihah Mohammad
    Din, Ami Hassan Md
    Pa'suya, Muhammad Faiz
    Omar, Abdullah Hisam
    Abdullah, Nazirah Mohamad
    Hamden, Mohammad Hanif
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 45 (23) : 8968 - 8994
  • [23] IRG2018: A regional geoid model in Iran using Least Squares Collocation
    Ramouz, Sabah
    Afrasteh, Yosra
    Reguzzoni, Mirko
    Safari, Abdolreza
    Saadat, Abdoreza
    STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 2019, 63 (02) : 191 - 214
  • [24] IRG2018: A regional geoid model in Iran using Least Squares Collocation
    Sabah Ramouz
    Yosra Afrasteh
    Mirko Reguzzoni
    Abdolreza Safari
    Abdoreza Saadat
    Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2019, 63 : 191 - 214
  • [25] Computation of a Gravimetric Geoid Within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) by Least-Squares Collocation
    Abdulaziz O. Alothman
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2020, 45 : 381 - 389
  • [26] Computation of a Gravimetric Geoid Within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) by Least-Squares Collocation
    Alothman, Abdulaziz O.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 45 (01) : 381 - 389
  • [27] COMPUTATION OF GEOID FROM DEFLECTIONS OF VERTICAL USING A LEAST-SQUARES SURFACE FITTING TECHNIQUE
    MERRY, CL
    VANICEK, P
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1973, 54 (04): : 230 - 230
  • [28] GEOID HEIGHT COMPUTATION IN STRIP-AREA PROJECTS BY USING LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION
    Doganalp, Serkan
    ACTA GEODYNAMICA ET GEOMATERIALIA, 2016, 13 (02): : 167 - 176
  • [29] A Modified Least-Squares Mismatched Filter for Use in Radar Applications with Additive Noise
    Kempf, Jerrod
    Jackson, Julie Ann
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RADAR CONFERENCE (RADAR), 2020, : 804 - 809
  • [30] A method to validate gravimetric-geoid computation software based on Stokes's integral formula
    W. E. Featherstone
    J. G. Olliver
    Journal of Geodesy, 1997, 71 : 571 - 576