Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

被引:0
|
作者
P. Lindström
M. Häggman
J. Wadström
机构
[1] Department of Transplantation Surgery,
[2] Uppsala University Hospital,undefined
[3] S-751 85 Uppsala,undefined
[4] Sweden,undefined
[5] Department of Urology,undefined
[6] Uppsala University Hospital,undefined
[7] S-751 85 Uppsala,undefined
[8] Sweden,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) was introduced to increase the safety of living donor nephrectomies. Herein we evaluate the first HALS living donor nephrectomies performed at our center. Methods: Traditional laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLS) (n = 11) and HALS nephrectomies (n = 11) were included in the study. One patient from the TLS group was excluded because the operation was converted to open nephrectomy. We compared the operating times (OT) and warm ischemia times (WIT) for the two procedures and calculated the operating costs. Results: Mean OT was 270 min in the TLS group and 197 min in the HALS group; thus, there was, a significant reduction of 27% with HALS. WIT was 297 sec for the TLS group and 214 sec for the HALS group, for a reduction of 28%. Costs were also lowered for HALS. Conclusion: In addition to shortening both OT and WIT, HALS enhances the safety margin of the procedure, especially during trocar placement. It is further helpful in preventing torsion of the kidney and controlling potential bleedings, as well as during vascular stapling and kidney removal.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 425
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hand assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Kagaya, T
    Watanabe, E
    Yoshitake, O
    Fujita, S
    Shimamura, Y
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 35 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [32] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy
    Sun, Pamela
    Renard, Julien
    Matter, Maurice
    Hagen, Monika E.
    Hadaya, Karine
    Pascual, Manuel
    Venetz, Jean-Pierre
    Demartines, Nicholas
    Buhler, Leo
    Morel, Philippe
    Iselin, Christophe
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S787 - S788
  • [33] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: New combination of hand-assisted and standard approaches
    Wu, CT
    Chiang, YJ
    Liu, KL
    Chu, SH
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (07) : 1909 - 1911
  • [34] Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Cost-effective Approach
    Ye, Jianfei
    Huang, Yi
    Hou, Xiaofei
    Zhao, Lei
    Wang, Guoliang
    Tian, Xiaojun
    Tang, Wenhao
    Fu, Yan
    Ma, Lulin
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (01) : 92 - 95
  • [35] Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.
    Dols, Leonienke F. C.
    Kok, Niels F. M.
    Terkivatan, Turkan
    Tran, Khe T. C.
    Alwayn, Ian P. J.
    Weimar, Willem
    IJzermans, Jan N. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 437 - 437
  • [36] Comparison of recovery between open live donor nephrectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.
    Moon, TD
    Armbrust, M
    Nakada, SY
    Wolf, JS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 116 - 116
  • [37] Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy
    Tanaka, M
    Tokuda, N
    Naito, S
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2003, 34 (04) : 267 - 269
  • [38] Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy superior to laparoscopic nephrectomy
    Wadström, J
    Lindström, P
    Engström, BM
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (02) : 782 - 783
  • [39] Tips and tricks for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Schuster, TG
    Wolf, JS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 250 - 251
  • [40] Hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    蔡明
    China Medical Abstracts, 2003, (02) : 132 - 132