R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: an empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan

被引:0
|
作者
Junichi Nishimura
Hiroyuki Okamuro
机构
[1] Hitotsubashi University,
来源
关键词
Industrial cluster; University-industry partnership; Small and medium enterprise; R&D; Patent; O23; O32; O38; R38;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Industrial clusters have attracted increasing attention as important locations of innovation. Therefore, several countries have started promotion policies for industrial clusters. However, there are few empirical studies on cluster policies. This paper examines the effects of the “Industrial Cluster Project” (ICP) in Japan on the R&D productivity of participants, using a unique dataset of 229 small firms, and discusses the conditions necessary for the effective organization of cluster policies. Different from former policy approaches, the ICP aims at building collaborative networks between universities and industries and supports the autonomous development of existing regional industries without direct intervention in the clustering process. Thus far, the ICP is similar to indirect support systems adopted by successful European clusters. Our estimation results suggest that participation in the cluster project alone does not affect R&D productivity. Moreover, research collaboration with a partner in the same cluster region decreases R&D productivity both in terms of the quantity and quality of patents. Therefore, in order to improve the R&D efficiency of local firms, it is also important to construct wide-range collaborative networks within and beyond the clusters, although most clusters focus on the network at a narrowly defined local level. However, cluster participants apply for more patents than others without reducing patent quality when they collaborate with national universities in the same cluster region.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 144
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] R&D investments under endogenous cluster formation
    Dawid, Herbert
    Hellmann, Tim
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 174 : 253 - 283
  • [22] A comparison of R&D indicators for the Vancouver biotechnology cluster
    Segal Graduate School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville St., Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2008, 14 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [23] R&D policy, productivity growth and distance to frontier
    Minniti, Antonio
    Venturini, Francesco
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 156 : 92 - 94
  • [24] Global R&D project management and organization: A taxonomy
    Chiesa, V
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 (05) : 341 - 359
  • [25] The coordination of globalized R&D activities through project teams organization: an exploratory empirical study
    Mendez, A
    JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2003, 38 (02) : 96 - 109
  • [26] R&D project management standardization:An empirical research
    Guo, Guilin
    Chenz, Yidong
    Sun, Yuan
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1063 - +
  • [27] European BWR R&D cluster for innovative passive safety systems - Programme and project structure
    Hicken, EF
    vonLensa, W
    ANNUAL MEETING ON NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY '96, 1996, : 298 - 301
  • [28] Organization of R&D - an evaluation of best practices
    Whatmore, J
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2003, 36 (03) : 311 - 312
  • [29] Does Cluster Policy Trigger R&D Activity? Evidence from German Biotech Contests
    Engel, Dirk
    Mitze, Timo
    Patuelli, Roberto
    Reinkowski, Janina
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2013, 21 (11) : 1735 - 1759
  • [30] R&D and productivity in Danish firms: some empirical evidence
    Smith, V
    Dilling-Hansen, M
    Eriksson, T
    Madsen, ES
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (16) : 1797 - 1806