Risk assessment in new software development projects at the front end: a fuzzy logic approach

被引:0
|
作者
Ming-Yuan Hsieh
Yu-Chin Hsu
Ching-Torng Lin
机构
[1] National Taichung University of Education,Department of International Business
[2] Dayeh University,Department of Information Management
[3] Dayeh University,undefined
关键词
New software development; Software project risk evaluation; Fuzzy weighted average; Fuzzy risk impact rating; Electronic toll collection service systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New software development (NSD) has inherent complexity, uncertainty, and risk. Risk analysis and mitigation is perhaps the most critical activity in an NSD project, yet such risk evaluation is often not adequately performed. To reduce the high failure rate of NSD projects, managers require more effective tools for evaluating and managing NSD project risks. Limited by both the nature and timing of NSD, risk evaluation is associated with data, information, and imprecise or ambiguous knowledge. Fuzzy logic is well suited for analysis in this situation. Thus, a fuzzy risk impact rating (FRIR) was developed for determining the total project risk exposure level for an NSD project according to risk attributes associated with the project, such as organizational environment, users, requirements, project complexity, team, and planning and control. The FRIR is composed of attributes’ possible ratings and corresponding severity levels, and is aggregated using fuzzy weighted average. As an illustration, the development of a new electronic toll collection project by a Taiwanese company is evaluated. This evaluation evidences that the fuzzy logic-based risk evaluation model can efficiently aid managers in dealing with ambiguity, imprecision, and complexity in NSD risk evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 305
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Logic-Based Method for Risk Assessment of Belt and Road Infrastructure Projects
    Andric, Jelena M.
    Wang, Jiayuan
    Zou, Patrick X. W.
    Zhang, Jingrong
    Zhon, Ruoyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 145 (12)
  • [32] Evaluation of New Product Development Projects using Artificial Intelligence and Fuzzy Logic
    Feyzioglu, Orhan
    Bueyukozkan, Gulcin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 11, 2006, 11 : 183 - 189
  • [33] A Fuzzy Risk Assessment in Software Development Defuzzified by Signed Distance
    Lee, Huey-Ming
    Lin, Lily
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5712 : 195 - +
  • [34] A fuzzy logic based approach for software testing
    Zhang, Zili
    Zhou, Yanhui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 21 (04) : 709 - 722
  • [35] A fuzzy logic approach to software testing and debugging
    Madsen, H.
    Thyregod, P.
    Burtschy, B.
    Albeanu, G.
    Popentiu, F.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MANAGING RISK, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1435 - +
  • [36] Assessment of Expenses of Software Projects Development
    Jovan, Zivadinovic
    Zorica, Medic
    Dragan, Ivkovic
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2014, (3-4) : 117 - 125
  • [37] A fuzzy group decision making approach to new product concept screening at the fuzzy front end
    Yan, Hong-Bin
    Ma, Tieju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (13) : 4021 - 4049
  • [38] Risk management in construction projects using fuzzy logic
    Caballero, Amaury A.
    Yen, Kang K.
    Roig, Gustavo
    [J]. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information and Management Sciences, 2005, 4 : 3 - 9
  • [39] A New Process Framework for Managing the Fuzzy Front End of New Healthcare Device Development
    Yang, Fan
    Qin, Zhen
    Lin, Min
    An, Wa
    [J]. DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY, DUXU 2023, PT V, 2023, 14034 : 480 - 491
  • [40] A FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH FOR DRONE CAPABILITY ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT
    Zlateva, P.
    Hristozov, S.
    Velev, D.
    [J]. ISPRS ICWG III/IVA GI4DM 2019 - GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 42-3 (W8): : 485 - 489