Comparative Analysis of Aviation Occurrence Patterns among Three Northeast Asian Countries: South Korea, China and Japan

被引:0
|
作者
Soohwan Oh
Jungwoo Cho
机构
[1] Korea Airports Corporation,Dept. of Air and Space Transportation
[2] Korea Transport Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
Aviation safety; Aviation occurrence; Comparative analysis; Logistic regression; Latent class analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the commonalities and differences in aviation occurrences among three Northeast Asian countries–South Korea, China and Japan, using the ICAO’s Integrated Safety Trend Analysis and Reporting System (iSTARS) dataset. Logistic regression and latent class analysis are employed to identify factors influencing the likelihood of fatalities and to classify occurrences into distinct groups. The findings indicate that operational issues in airspace pose greater risks than runway-related issues in this region. The ground and landing flight phases have lower fatality likelihoods compared to the cruise phase, and winter seasons show reduced odds of fatalities. Latent class analysis identifies five distinct occurrence classes, highlighting specific risks and areas for targeted interventions. Technical and environmental issues are prominent in Japan, while operational issues during the cruise and maneuvering phases are significant in South Korea, associated with a high fatality rate. Light recreational general aviation flights pose a considerable risk of fatalities in China and Japan. The findings of this study highlight the need for comprehensive research to explore the causes and contributing factors of aviation occurrences in different countries to enhance safety practices and mitigate fatality risks.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4897 / 4905
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Depression, quality of life and living will of community-dwelling postmenopausal women in three Asian countries: Korea, China and Japan.
    Ina, K.
    Hayashi, T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 : 70 - 70
  • [42] Depression, quality of life (QoL) and will to live of community-dwelling postmenopausal women in three Asian countries: Korea, China and Japan
    Ina, Koichiro
    Hayashi, Toshio
    Nomura, Hideki
    Ishitsuka, Asako
    Hirai, Hisako
    Iguchi, Akihisa
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2011, 53 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [43] Smoking and Drinking Behaviors among Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Three Southeast Asian Countries
    John Knodel
    Wiraporn Pothisiri
    Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 2021, 36 : 369 - 386
  • [44] Smoking and Drinking Behaviors among Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Three Southeast Asian Countries
    Knodel, John
    Pothisiri, Wiraporn
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL GERONTOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04) : 369 - 386
  • [45] Assessing Motives in Northeast Asian Aid Allocations: China, Japan, and Korea as a Collective Group and as Individual Donors
    Sohn, Hyuk-Sang
    Kim, Seokwoo
    Woo, Changbin
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 18 (02): : 123 - 144
  • [46] Legitimizing friends and denouncing enemies: A comparative analysis of Ukraine war coverage in China, South Korea, and Japan
    Lee, Misook
    Zhang, Rong
    Hayashi, Kaori
    JOURNALISM, 2024,
  • [47] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BAMBOO CULTURE AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN CHINA, JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA
    Jiayan, Yun
    SOCIOINT14: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, 2014, : 570 - 579
  • [48] The roles of networks among innovators in regional innovation: comparative analysis between China and South Korea
    Yoon, Junghyun
    Rhee, Jaehoon
    Dedahanov, Alisher Tohirovich
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (05) : 790 - 804
  • [49] Competitiveness in Tourism: A Comparative Analysis of Selected South-Asian Countries
    Javed, Mohsin
    Tuckova, Zuzana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOURISM RESEARCH (ICTR 2019), 2019, : 381 - 388
  • [50] Global Exposure and Openness: Comparative Analysis of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan
    Tsai, Ming-Chang
    Iwai, Noriko
    COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2013, 12 (03) : 301 - 329