A design for standards-based knowledge components

被引:0
|
作者
Anderson T.A. [1 ]
Merrill M.D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Learning Components, 95123 San Jose, CA
[2] Department of Instructional Technology, Utah State University, E-229, 84322-2830 Logan, UT
关键词
extensible markup language; instructional design; knowledge component; software components [!text type='Java']Java[!/text] beans; transaction theory;
D O I
10.1007/BF02940887
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
THIS PAPER describes ongoing work in designing and developing modular software components that are based on open standards and conform to a specific instructional design theory. The authors identified three problems exhibited by modern authoring tool software. The identified problems are proprietary architectures, instructional design theory neutrality, and monolithic structures. To begin solving these problems, software components were written in the Java programming language as Java Beans. The Java Beans conformed to the Java Bean component architecture specification. Instructional content was then captured and tagged utilizing eXtensible Markup Language (XML), which has recently been adopted by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) as an open Internet standard. Finally, to promote adherence to a particular instructional theory, the prototype components were based upon the knowledge representation scheme and instructional strategy prescriptions of Merrill's instructional transaction theory. The focus of this paper is on applied technological solutions to overcome the limitations of current authoring environments. Technological solutions have been employed to meet larger goals of improved computer-based instruction. The implications for instruction resulting from this approach are that the original goals of instructional transaction theory can be met. These goals are to enable the development of a) more effective instruction, b) more efficient instruction, c) better instructional learning environments, and d) more adaptive instruction. © 2000 Springer.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 29
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seven reasons for standards-based grading
    Scriffiny, Patricia L.
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2008, 66 (02) : 70 - 74
  • [42] Assessment of standards-based biology teaching
    Leonard, WH
    Penick, JE
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2005, 67 (02): : 73 - 76
  • [43] An Australian Perspective on Standards-Based Education, Teacher Knowledge, and Students of English as an Additional Language
    Hammond, Jennifer
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 2014, 48 (03) : 507 - 532
  • [44] An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching and Assessing Standards-Based Assessment Design to Preservice Teachers
    Drost, Bryan R.
    Levine, Anita C.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-US, 2023, 203 (03): : 574 - 586
  • [45] Professional knowledge and standards-based reforms: Learning from the experiences of early career teachers
    Allard, Andrea
    Doecke, Brenton
    ENGLISH TEACHING-PRACTICE AND CRITIQUE, 2014, 13 (01): : 39 - 54
  • [46] Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform
    Sandholtz, JH
    Ogawa, RT
    Scribner, SP
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2004, 106 (06): : 1177 - 1202
  • [47] A lapse in standards -: Linking standards-based reform with student achievement
    Nave, B
    Miech, E
    Mosteller, F
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2000, 82 (02) : 128 - 132
  • [48] Standards-Based Solutions for a Media World in Transition
    Dubs E.
    SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, 2022, 131 (08): : 105 - 106
  • [49] Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations
    Grunzke, Richard
    Breuers, Sebastian
    Gesing, Sandra
    Herres-Pawlis, Sonja
    Kruse, Martin
    Blunk, Dirk
    de la Garza, Luis
    Packschies, Lars
    Schaefer, Patrick
    Schaerfe, Charlotta
    Schlemmer, Tobias
    Steinke, Thomas
    Schuller, Bernd
    Mueller-Pfefferkorn, Ralph
    Jaekel, Rene
    Nagel, Wolfgang E.
    Atkinson, Malcolm
    Krueger, Jens
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2014, 26 (10): : 1744 - 1759
  • [50] VApp: A standards-based container for cloud providers
    Schmidt R.W.
    Grarup S.
    Operating Systems Review (ACM), 2010, 44 (04): : 115 - 123