A Hybrid Decision-Making Framework for Selecting the Emergency Alternatives

被引:0
|
作者
Liguo Fei
Yongchi Ma
机构
[1] Shandong University,School of Political Science and Public Administration
[2] Shandong University,lnstitute of State Governance
来源
关键词
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Linguistic variables; Emergency alternative selection; Hybrid information; MADM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The frequent occurrence of emergencies has created huge economic losses and numerous casualties and has seriously affected the sustainable development of many societies. The abruptness, destructiveness, unpredictability and complexity of emergency situations pose a great challenge in implementing appropriate responses. To effectively respond to emergencies, it is necessary to select the most suitable, or several, of the numerous emergency plan alternatives, especially when the evolutionary direction of the emergency is highly uncertain. Some progress has been made in the study of emergency alternative selection (EAS) but the capacity for emergency decision-making in real disasters is still quite limited. Therefore, more in-depth research is necessary. As a remedy to the EAS problems, such as unitary information expression, inflexible decision-making processes and insufficient attention to uncertainty, this study proposes a hybrid decision-making method that considers an intuitionistic fuzzy environment, linguistic environment and their hybrid environment, and implements the conversion and processing of decision-making information in different environments based on the Dempster–Shafer theory (DST). This model provides a more flexible evaluation method for decision-makers, and provides a complete decision-making process for EAS. A flood disaster case study from China is used to demonstrate and verify the effectiveness of the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页码:2123 / 2137
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emergency decision-making combining cumulative prospect theory and group decision-making
    Liu, Wenjing
    Li, Lei
    [J]. GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2019, 4 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [32] Emergency decision-making combining cumulative prospect theory and group decision-making
    Wenjing Liu
    Lei Li
    [J]. Granular Computing, 2019, 4 : 39 - 52
  • [33] DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN EMERGENCY ROOM
    TISCHLER, GL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1966, 14 (01) : 69 - &
  • [34] ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    McGrath, Pam
    Phillips, Emma
    [J]. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2009, 28 (02) : 38 - 53
  • [35] Diagnostic Decision-Making in the Emergency Department
    Medford-Davis, Laura N.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Mahajan, Prashant
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 65 (06) : 1097 - +
  • [36] Ethical Decision-making in the Emergency Department
    McGreevy, Jolion
    Isaacs, Eric
    Marill, Keith
    Venkat, Arvind
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (10) : 1196 - 1196
  • [37] TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED SOCIOTECHNICAL FRAMEWORK FOR SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION-MAKING FOR EMERGENCY CARE
    Abd Hamid, Harris
    Waterson, Patrick
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS 2010, 2010, : 372 - 380
  • [38] Collaborative emergency decision-making: A framework for deep learning with social media data
    Qin, Jindong
    Li, Minxuan
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2024, 267
  • [39] Framework structure and fuzzy processing of nuclear emergency decision-making evaluation system
    Lu, Nengzhi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2007, 2 : 58 - 60
  • [40] ANALYSIS OF DECISION AIDING IN SUBMARINE EMERGENCY DECISION-MAKING
    WEINGAERTNER, ST
    LEVIS, AH
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 1989, 25 (03) : 349 - 358