Mycorrhizal response of Solanum tuberosum to homokaryotic versus dikaryotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

被引:0
|
作者
Victoria Terry
Vasilis Kokkoris
Matthew Villeneuve-Laroche
Bianca Turcu
Kendyll Chapman
Calvin Cornell
Zhiming Zheng
Franck Stefani
Nicolas Corradi
机构
[1] University of Ottawa,Department of Biology
[2] Ottawa Research and Development Centre,Department of Biology
[3] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Present address: Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A
[4] University of Ottawa,LIFE), Faculty of Science, Section Systems Ecology
[5] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,undefined
来源
Mycorrhiza | 2023年 / 33卷
关键词
Homokaryotic; Heterokaryotic; Mycorrhizal response (MR); Potato; Nucleotype ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are obligate plant symbionts of most land plants. In these organisms, thousands of nuclei that are either genetically similar (homokaryotic) or derived from two distinct parents (dikaryotic) co-exist in a large syncytium. Here, we investigated the impact of these two nuclear organizations on the mycorrhizal response of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) by inoculating four potato cultivars with eight Rhizophagus irregularis strains individually (four homokaryotic and four dikaryotic). By evaluating plant and fungal fitness-related traits four months post inoculation, we found that AMF genetic organization significantly affects the mycorrhizal response of host plants. Specifically, homokaryotic strains lead to higher total, shoot, and tuber biomass and a higher number of tubers, compared to dikaryotic strains. However, fungal fitness-related traits showed no clear differences between homokaryotic and dikaryotic strains. Nucleotype content analysis of single spores confirmed that the nucleotype ratio of AMF heterokaryon spores can shift depending on host identity. Together, these findings continue to highlight significant ecological differences derived from the two distinct genetic organizations in AMF.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 344
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AXENIC CULTURE OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
    WILLIAMS, PG
    METHODS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 24 : 203 - 220
  • [32] Global distributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Treseder, KK
    Cross, A
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 9 (02) : 305 - 316
  • [33] Hormetic responses in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Jakobsen, Iver
    Murmann, Lisa Munkvold
    Rosendahl, Soren
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 159
  • [34] Global Distributions of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
    Kathleen K. Treseder
    Alison Cross
    Ecosystems, 2006, 9 : 305 - 316
  • [35] Nutritional ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Hodge, A.
    Helgason, T.
    Fitter, A. H.
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 3 (04) : 267 - 273
  • [36] Flavonoids and arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi
    Vierheilig, H
    Bago, B
    Albrecht, C
    Poulin, MJ
    Piché, Y
    FLAVONOIDS IN THE LIVING SYSTEM, 1998, 439 : 9 - 33
  • [37] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake
    Mohammad Miransari
    Archives of Microbiology, 2011, 193 : 77 - 81
  • [38] ANTIOXIDANT DEFENSE RESPONSE OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND SETARIA VIRIDIS
    Zhang, Hao
    Wu, Zilong
    Wang, Xiaogai
    Zhao, Xin
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2023, 55 (05) : 1951 - 1960
  • [39] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake
    Miransari, Mohammad
    ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 193 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [40] Growth model for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Schnepf, A.
    Roose, T.
    Schweiger, P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2008, 5 (24) : 773 - 784