Biodiversity and its conservation in the Sundarban Mangrove Ecosystem

被引:0
|
作者
Brij Gopal
Malavika Chauhan
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Nehru University,School of Environmental Sciences
来源
Aquatic Sciences | 2006年 / 68卷
关键词
Mangrove; hydrology; salinity; sea level rise; conversion to agriculture; aquaculture; climate change; conservation; endangered wildlife;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Sundarban, covering about one million ha in the delta of the rivers Ganga, Brahmaputra and Meghna is shared between Bangladesh (~60%) and India (~40%), and is the world’s largest coastal wetland. The area experiences a subtropical monsoonal climate with an annual rainfall of 1,600–1,800 mm and severe cyclonic storms. Enormous amounts of sediments carried by the rivers contribute to its expansion and dynamics. Salinity gradients change over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. The biodiversity includes about 350 species of vascular plants, 250 fishes and 300 birds, besides numerous species of phytoplankton, fungi, bacteria, zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, molluscs, reptiles, amphibians and mammals. Species composition and community structure vary east to west, and along the hydrological and salinity gradients. Sundarban is the habitat of many rare and endangered animals (Batagur baska, Pelochelys bibroni, Chelonia mydas), especially the Royal Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris). Javan rhino, wild buffalo, hog deer, and barking deer are now extinct from the area. Large areas of the Sundarban mangroves have been converted into paddy fields over the past two centuries, and more recently into shrimp farms. The Sundarban has been extensively exploited for timber, fish, prawns and fodder. The regulation of river flows by a series of dams, barrages and embankments for diverting water upstream for various human needs and for flood control has caused large reduction in freshwater inflow and seriously affected the biodiversity because of an increase in salinity and changes in sedimentation. Heritiera fomes (locally called Sundari, from which Sundarban derives its name), Nypa fruticans and Phoenix paludosa are declining rapidly. During the past three decades, large parts of the remaining Sundarban have been protected for wildlife, particularly tiger, through the creation of several sanctuaries and a biosphere reserve. Parts of the Sundarban in both India and Bangladesh have been declared World Heritage sites. However, its biodiversity continues to be threatened by a growing human population that not only places pressure on its biological resources, but also impacts on the freshwater inflows from upstream areas. Oil exploration in coastal areas is also emerging as a new threat. Further threats arise from global climate change, especially sea level rise. The future of the Sundarban will depend upon the management of freshwater resources as much as on the conservation of its biological resources.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 354
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploration of N2 fixation and denitrification processes in the Sundarban mangrove ecosystem, India
    Das, S.
    Ganguly, D.
    Mukherjee, A.
    Chakraborty, S.
    De, T. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GEO-MARINE SCIENCES, 2020, 49 (05) : 740 - 747
  • [32] Biodiversity and Its Conservation
    K. Venkataraman
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 82 (Suppl 2) : 271 - 282
  • [33] Conservation economics: economic analysis of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services
    Polasky S.
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2009, 10 (1) : 1 - 20
  • [34] Conservation economics: economic analysis of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services
    Polasky, Stephen
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2009, 10 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [35] Ecosystem indices to support global biodiversity conservation
    Rowland, Jessica A.
    Bland, Lucie M.
    Keith, David A.
    Juffe-Bignoli, Diego
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Etter, Andres
    Ferrer-Paris, Jose Rafael
    Miller, Rebecca M.
    Skowno, Andrew L.
    Nicholson, Emily
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2020, 13 (01):
  • [36] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Harrington, Richard
    Anton, Christian
    Dawson, Terence P.
    de Bello, Francesco
    Feld, Christian K.
    Haslett, John R.
    Kluvankova-Oravska, Tatiana
    Kontogianni, Areti
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Luck, Gary W.
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    Samways, Michael J.
    Settele, Josef
    Skourtos, Michalis
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Zobel, Martin
    Harrison, Paula A.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2773 - 2790
  • [37] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ridder, Ben
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) : 781 - 790
  • [38] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in conservation of rivers and streams
    Moulton, TP
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 1999, 9 (06) : 573 - 578
  • [39] Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation
    Carolina Levis
    Bernardo M. Flores
    João Vitor Campos-Silva
    Nivaldo Peroni
    Arie Staal
    Maíra C. G. Padgurschi
    Wetherbee Dorshow
    Bruno Moraes
    Morgan Schmidt
    Taku Wate Kuikuro
    Huke Kuikuro
    Kumessi Wauja
    Kalutata Kuikuro
    Afukaka Kuikuro
    Carlos Fausto
    Bruna Franchetto
    Jennifer Watling
    Helena Lima
    Michael Heckenberger
    Charles R. Clement
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8 : 866 - 879
  • [40] Beyond ecosystem services as justification for biodiversity conservation
    Prendergast, Kit S.
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 141 - 143