The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework

被引:0
|
作者
Yuanhong Liao
Weihong Yang
机构
[1] China Agricultural University,College of Economics and Management
关键词
Private-sphere pro-environmental behaviours (Private-sphere PEBs); Determinants; Intrapersonal factors; Contextual constraints; Integrating framework;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the development of industrial civilisation, urban environmental problems are increasingly severe. However, Chinese urban residents' actual adoption level of pro-environment behaviours (PEBs) is still relatively low. In order to improve the residents' PEBs adoption, this paper combined the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the Norm Activation Model and the Attitude-Behaviour-Context theory into a holistic framework to explore the determinants of private-sphere PEBs. In this model, we assess the determinants of private-sphere PEBs from perspectives of intrapersonal and contextual factors and treat private-sphere PEBs as three different types of behaviours, namely environmental purchasing behaviours, environmental transport behaviours and conservation behaviours, rather than aggregated and undifferentiated construct or a single item behaviour. The model was tested empirically by primary data collected from 1,054 citizens in Beijing and Shanghai in China. The results indicate that intrapersonal factors, such as pro-environmental intentions and personal norms, are significant positive factors of private-sphere PEBs adoption; contextual constraints have negative direct effects on the three types of private-sphere PEBs adoption; contextual constraints act as a moderator between pro-environmental intentions and private-sphere PEBs, while the moderating effects are sensitive to the types of private-sphere PEBs. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of residents' adoption of private-sphere PEBs and making more targeted policies accordingly.
引用
收藏
页码:8566 / 8592
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Firms for Sustainable Manufacturing: Understanding the Key Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour
    Pyo, Sangjae
    Chung, Seung Gun
    Ma, Hyoung Ryul
    Oh, Dong Hoon
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 29 (02) : 262 - 281
  • [22] The elusive impact of pro-environmental intention on holiday on pro-environmental behaviour at home
    Wu, Jialin
    Font, Xavier
    Liu, Jingyan
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 85
  • [23] Intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour
    Sander van der Linden
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 612 - 613
  • [24] To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour
    Anne M. van Valkengoed
    Wokje Abrahamse
    Linda Steg
    [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6 : 1482 - 1492
  • [25] To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour
    van Valkengoed, Anne M.
    Abrahamse, Wokje
    Steg, Linda
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (11) : 1482 - 1492
  • [26] Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour
    Gatersleben, Birgitta
    Murtagh, Niamh
    Abrahamse, Wokje
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (04) : 374 - 392
  • [27] Normative influence and pro-environmental behaviour
    Tronu, Giuseppe
    Fornara, Ferdinando
    Carrus, Giuseppe
    Bonnes, Mirilia
    [J]. PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, 2012, 7 (03) : 337 - 354
  • [28] Spillover of Social Norms at Work On Employees’ Self-Reported Private Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviour: A Mixed Method Investigation
    Jaich H.
    Jastram S.M.
    Blind K.
    [J]. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 2023, 75 (4): : 519 - 547
  • [29] Normative Influence of pro-Environmental Intentions in Adolescents with Different Personality Types
    Poskus, Mykolas Simas
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (01) : 263 - 276
  • [30] Normative Influence of pro-Environmental Intentions in Adolescents with Different Personality Types
    Mykolas Simas Poškus
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2020, 39 : 263 - 276