A numerical evaluation of meta-heuristic techniques in portfolio optimisation

被引:0
|
作者
N. Loukeris
D. Donelly
A. Khuman
Y. Peng
机构
[1] University of Maryland,School of Undergraduate Studies, Europe, UMUC
[2] University of Essex,CCFEA
关键词
Portfolio management; Heuristics; Efficient frontier; Power and quadratic utility;
D O I
10.1007/s12351-008-0028-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Optimal portfolio management under only mean and variance/covariance measures in Markowitz (J Finance 7(1):77–91, 1952; J Polit Econ:152–158, 1952) and Tobin (Rev Econ Stud 25:65–86, 1958; Econometrica 26(1):24–36, 1958) framework, is inefficient in real stock markets, as investors do not have quadratic utility functions, and returns are not normally, independently, and identically distributed. Hence alternative forms of utility functions with further higher moments such as the power utility should be used, but these do not provide closed form solutions towards a good feasible portfolio selection. A variety of innovative heuristics have been put forward recently. Hence implementing empirical data, we test and compare different heuristic techniques for portfolio management with power utility as well as contrasting the differences between power utility maximised portfolios and quadratic utility maximised portfolios.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 103
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A meta-heuristic extension of the Lagrangian heuristic framework
    Ngulo, Uledi
    Larsson, Torbjörn
    Quttineh, Nils-Hassan
    [J]. Optimization Methods and Software, 2024, 39 (05) : 1008 - 1039
  • [42] The Portfolio Heuristic Optimisation System (PHOS)
    N. Loukeris
    I. Eleftheriadis
    E. Livanis
    [J]. Computational Economics, 2016, 48 : 627 - 648
  • [43] An Exploration of Meta-Heuristic Approaches for the Project Portfolio Selection and Scheduling Problem in a Defence Context
    Harrison, Kyle Robert
    Elsayed, Saber
    Weir, Terence
    Garanovich, Ivan L.
    Taylor, Richard
    Sarker, Ruhul
    [J]. 2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, : 1395 - 1402
  • [44] Analysis and benchmarking of meta-heuristic techniques for lay-up optimization
    Bloomfield, Mark W.
    Herencia, J. Enrique
    Weaver, Paul M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2010, 88 (5-6) : 272 - 282
  • [45] Cross-Project Change Prediction Using Meta-Heuristic Techniques
    Bansal, Ankita
    Jajoria, Sourabh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED METAHEURISTIC COMPUTING, 2019, 10 (01) : 43 - 61
  • [46] Application of Meta-Heuristic Optimization Techniques for Design Optimization of a Robotic Gripper
    Mahanta, Golak Bihari
    Rout, Amruta
    Deepak, B. B. V. L.
    Biswal, Bibhuti Bhusan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED METAHEURISTIC COMPUTING, 2019, 10 (03) : 107 - 133
  • [47] Stochastic modeling and optimization of turbogenerator performance using meta-heuristic techniques
    Sinwar, Deepak
    Kumar, Naveen
    Kumar, Ashish
    Saini, Monika
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2024, : 4414 - 4438
  • [48] Hydro-Thermal Scheduling Using Meta-Heuristic Optimization Techniques
    Mundotiya, Prahlad
    Mathuria, Parul
    Tiwari, H. P.
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 10TH POWER INDIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, PIICON, 2022,
  • [49] A New Adaptive Meta-Heuristic Based on a Vector Evaluated Approach for Portfolio Investiment Optimization
    Correa Costa, Leticia de Fatima
    Carmona Cortes, Omar Andres
    Augusto Costa, Joao Pedro
    [J]. INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL-IBEROAMERICAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 22 (64): : 85 - 101
  • [50] A novel codification for meta-heuristic techniques used in distribution network reconfiguration
    Swarnkar, Anil
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Niazi, K. R.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (07) : 1619 - 1626