Interspecific interactions, movement patterns and habitat use in a diverse coastal shark assemblage

被引:0
|
作者
Michelle R. Heupel
Samantha E. M. Munroe
Elodie J. I. Lédée
Andrew Chin
Colin A. Simpfendorfer
机构
[1] Australian Institute of Marine Science,Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering
[2] James Cook University,TERN Ecosystem Surveillance Monitoring, School of Biological Sciences
[3] The University of Adelaide,Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Ottawa
[4] Carleton University,Carleton Institute for Biology
来源
Marine Biology | 2019年 / 166卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sharks are a highly diverse predatory taxon and are regularly found in large, potentially competitive, assemblages. However, the mechanisms that enable long-term coexistence and factors that drive complementary movement are poorly understood. As interspecific interactions can have a large influence on survival and trophic linkages, research on shark assemblages could substantially increase our understanding of marine community dynamics. In this study, we used passive acoustic telemetry to compare the activity space size, spatial overlap and habitat use patterns of six co-occurring shark species from the same family in a tropical nearshore embayment. Our results indicated that all sizes of Rhizoprionodon taylori (a small-bodied, highly productive species) used significantly larger amounts of space (e.g., mean 95% KUD = 85.9 km2) than juveniles of large-bodied, less productive species (e.g., Carcharhinus amboinensis; 62.3 km2) that use nearshore areas as nursery areas. Most large, less productive species appeared risk averse by using less space, while the smaller more productive species took greater risk by roaming broadly. These movement strategies are likely a means of avoiding predation or gaining access to new or additional resources. Spatial overlap patterns varied substantially between species with overlap in core use areas ranging from 1.2 to 27.6%, but were consistent over time. Most species exhibited low spatial overlap, suggesting spatial partitioning to reduce interspecific competition. While a few species exhibited a high degree of spatial overlap (up to 60% of activity space extent), dietary diversity may reduce competition to support co-occurrence. These data suggest that complex interactions occur in communal nurseries in nearshore waters where species are in direct competition for resources at vulnerable life stages.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diel movement patterns and habitat preferences of the common thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus) in the Southern California Bight
    Cartamil, D.
    Wegner, N. C.
    Aalbers, S.
    Sepulveda, C. A.
    Baquero, A.
    Graham, J. B.
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2010, 61 (05) : 596 - 604
  • [32] The Amazonian Campina dragonfly assemblage: Patterns in microhabitat use and behaviour in a foraging habitat (Anisoptera)
    De Marco, P
    ODONATOLOGICA, 1998, 27 (02) : 239 - 248
  • [33] Snake co-occurrence patterns are best explained by habitat and hypothesized effects of interspecific interactions
    Steen, David A.
    McClure, Christopher J. W.
    Brock, Jean C.
    Rudolph, D. Craig
    Pierce, Josh B.
    Lee, James R.
    Humphries, W. Jeffrey
    Gregory, Beau B.
    Sutton, William B.
    Smith, Lora L.
    Baxley, Danna L.
    Stevenson, Dirk J.
    Guyer, Craig
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 83 (01) : 286 - 295
  • [34] Interspecific interference competition alters habitat use patterns in two species of land snails
    Kimura, Kazuki
    Chiba, Satoshi
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 815 - 825
  • [35] Interspecific interference competition alters habitat use patterns in two species of land snails
    Kazuki Kimura
    Satoshi Chiba
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24 : 815 - 825
  • [36] Does interspecific competition drive patterns of habitat use and relative density in harbour porpoises?
    Diaz Lopez, Bruno
    Methion, Severine
    MARINE BIOLOGY, 2018, 165 (05)
  • [37] Does interspecific competition drive patterns of habitat use and relative density in harbour porpoises?
    Bruno Díaz López
    Séverine Methion
    Marine Biology, 2018, 165
  • [38] Contrasting patterns of residency and space use of coastal sharks within a communal shark nursery
    Oh, Beverly Z. L.
    Thums, Michele
    Babcock, Russ C.
    Meeuwig, Jessica J.
    Pillans, Richard D.
    Speed, Conrad
    Meekan, Mark G.
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2017, 68 (08) : 1501 - 1517
  • [39] Habitat use and movement patterns in the graceful crag lizard, Pseudocordylus capensis
    Eifler, Douglas A.
    Eifler, Maria A.
    Eifler, Erin N.
    AFRICAN ZOOLOGY, 2007, 42 (02) : 152 - 157
  • [40] Movement patterns and habitat use of juvenile mangrove whiprays (Himantura granulata)
    Davy, Lauren E.
    Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
    Heupel, Michelle R.
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2015, 66 (06) : 481 - 492