Quality assessment method for geometrically distorted images

被引:1
|
作者
Liu B. [1 ]
Zhao M. [1 ]
Chen H. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Optical and Electronics Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan
关键词
displacement vector field; geometrical distortion; Hough transform; image quality assessment; line feature index;
D O I
10.1007/s12200-013-0341-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective assessment of image quality is important for image processing, which has been paid much attention to in recent years. However, there were few reports about objective quality assessment methods for geometrically distorted images. Different from the routine image degradation processing (for example, noise addition, contrast change and lossy compression), the geometric distortion results in the changes of the spatial relationship of image pixels, which makes the traditional quality assessment algorithms, such as mean square error (MSE) and peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) failure to obtain expected assessment results. In this paper, a full reference image quality assessment algorithm is proposed specifically for the quality evaluation of geometrically distorted images. This assessment algorithm takes into account three key factors, such as distortion intensity, distortion change rate and line feature index for perceptual quality assessment of images. Experimental results in this study show that the proposed assessment algorithm not only is significantly better than those of the traditional objective assessment methods such as PSNR and structural similarity index measurement (SSIM), but also has significant correlation with human subjective assessment. © 2013 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Motion estimation based registration of geometrically distorted images for watermark recovery
    Loo, P
    Kingsbury, N
    [J]. SECURITY AND WATERMARKING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS III, 2001, 4314 : 606 - 617
  • [22] Correction of geometrically distorted underwater images using shift map analysis
    Halder, Kalyan Kumar
    Paul, Manoranjan
    Tahtali, Murat
    Anavatti, Sreenatha G.
    Murshed, Manzur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2017, 34 (04) : 666 - 673
  • [23] Method to Quality Assessment of Stereo Images
    Ma, Jian
    An, Ping
    [J]. 2016 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE PROCESSING (VCIP), 2016,
  • [24] An Opinion-unaware Blind Quality Assessment Algorithm for Multiply Distorted Images
    Wang, Tongle
    Deng, Junchen
    [J]. ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2019, 11384
  • [25] No-Reference Quality Assessment for Multiply Distorted Images based on Deep Learning
    Sang, Qingbing
    Wu, Lixiu
    Li, Chaofeng
    Wu, Xiaojun
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL SMART CITIES CONFERENCE (ISC2), 2017,
  • [26] Blind Quality Assessment of Multiply Distorted Images Using Deep Neural Networks
    Wang, Zhongling
    Athar, Shahrukh
    Wang, Zhou
    [J]. IMAGE ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, ICIAR 2019, PT I, 2019, 11662 : 89 - 101
  • [27] No-Reference Quality Assessment for Multiply-Distorted Images in Gradient Domain
    Li, Qiaohong
    Lin, Weisi
    Fang, Yuming
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2016, 23 (04) : 541 - 545
  • [28] Efficient No-Reference Quality Assessment and Classification Model for Contrast Distorted Images
    Nafchi, Hossein Ziaei
    Cheriet, Mohamed
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2018, 64 (02) : 518 - 523
  • [29] Unified No-Reference Quality Assessment of Singly and Multiply Distorted Stereoscopic Images
    Jiang, Qiuping
    Shao, Feng
    Gao, Wei
    Chen, Zhuo
    Jiang, Gangyi
    Ho, Yo-Sung
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2019, 28 (04) : 1866 - 1881
  • [30] BLIND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLY-DISTORTED IMAGES BASED ON STRUCTURAL DEGRADATION
    Dai, Tao
    Gu, Ke
    Xu, Zhi-ya
    Tang, Qingtao
    Liang, Haoyi
    Zhang, Yong-bing
    Xia, Shu-Tao
    [J]. 2017 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2017, : 171 - 175