Tool-Use profiles in Undergraduate Mathematics

被引:0
|
作者
Marinos Anastasakis
Stephen Lerman
机构
[1] Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH),Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics
[2] London South Bank University,Department of Education
关键词
Activity theory; Cluster analysis; Resources; Tools; Tool-use profiles; University mathematics; Usage patterns;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research exploring undergraduates’ tool preferences in tertiary mathematics is currently limited. In this paper, we explore the tools mathematics and engineering students use when studying mathematics and the ways undergraduates combine these tools. Results from our survey (N = 628) showed that students in our sample use mostly their notes, the university’s virtual learning environment (VLE), other students and textbooks. Mathematics students were found using more online encyclopaedias, the university’s VLE, instant messaging and other students, whereas engineering students reported using more textbooks. By performing a cluster analysis, undergraduates were assigned to five distinct tool-use profiles: the peer-learning group (above average use of other students, instant messaging apps and social media); the online-learning group (above average use of online videos, online encyclopaedias, Wolfram Alpha and the university’s VLE); the blended-learning group (above average use of all the tools at their disposal); the no-users group (below average use of all tools except textbooks); and the selective-learning group (above average use of textbooks, online videos and lecturers). The majority of mathematics students were distributed across the peer-learning, online-learning and blended-learning groups, whereas most of the engineering students were found in the blended-learning, no-users and selective-learning groups.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 879
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards a Comparative Theory of the Primates' Tool-Use Behavior
    Mariyama, Toshisada
    Itoh, Hideaki
    ADVANCES IN NEURO-INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT I, 2009, 5506 : 327 - 335
  • [32] This racket is not mine: The influence of the tool-use on peripersonal space
    Biggio, Monica
    Bisio, Ambra
    Avanzino, Laura
    Ruggeri, Piero
    Bove, Marco
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2017, 103 : 54 - 58
  • [33] Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space
    Bourgeois, Jeremy
    Farne, Alessandro
    Coello, Yann
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 148 : 91 - 95
  • [34] Tool-use learning by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)
    Yumiko Yamazaki
    Chieko Echigo
    Masakado Saiki
    Masayuki Inada
    Shigeru Watanabe
    Atsushi Iriki
    Experimental Brain Research, 2011, 213 : 63 - 71
  • [35] The ecology of tool-use in the woodpecker finch (Cactospiza pallida)
    Tebbich, S
    Taborsky, M
    Fessl, B
    Dvorak, M
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 5 (05) : 656 - 664
  • [36] Tool-use learning in Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana)
    Ducoing, AM
    Thierry, B
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2005, 8 (02) : 103 - 113
  • [37] Tool-use learning by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)
    Yamazaki, Yumiko
    Echigo, Chieko
    Saiki, Masakado
    Inada, Masayuki
    Watanabe, Shigeru
    Iriki, Atsushi
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [38] Variations of tool and task characteristics reveal that tool-use postures are anticipated
    Bongers, RM
    Michaels, CF
    Smitsman, AW
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2004, 36 (03) : 305 - 315
  • [39] Tool-use by rats (Rattus norvegicus): tool-choice based on tool features
    Nagano, Akane
    Aoyama, Kenjiro
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2017, 20 (02) : 199 - 213
  • [40] THE USE OF SPREADSHEETS IN TEACHING UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS
    TURNER, JC
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1988, 12 (04) : 535 - 538