A comprehensive estimate of recent carbon sinks in China using both top-down and bottom-up approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Fei Jiang
Jing M. Chen
Lingxi Zhou
Weimin Ju
Huifang Zhang
Toshinobu Machida
Philippe Ciais
Wouter Peters
Hengmao Wang
Baozhang Chen
Lixin Liu
Chunhua Zhang
Hidekazu Matsueda
Yousuke Sawa
机构
[1] Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology,Department of Geography
[2] International Institute for Earth System Science,Department of Meteorology and Air Quality
[3] Nanjing University,Geochemical Research Department
[4] University of Toronto,undefined
[5] Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,undefined
[6] China Meteorological Administration,undefined
[7] State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System,undefined
[8] Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,undefined
[9] Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[10] National Institute for Environmental Studies,undefined
[11] Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement,undefined
[12] CEA CNRS UVSQ,undefined
[13] Wageningen University and Research Center,undefined
[14] University of Groningen,undefined
[15] Centre for Isotope Research,undefined
[16] Meteorological Research Institute,undefined
[17] School of Geography and Planning,undefined
[18] Ludong University,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Atmospheric inversions use measurements of atmospheric CO2 gradients to constrain regional surface fluxes. Current inversions indicate a net terrestrial CO2 sink in China between 0.16 and 0.35 PgC/yr. The uncertainty of these estimates is as large as the mean because the atmospheric network historically contained only one high altitude station in China. Here, we revisit the calculation of the terrestrial CO2 flux in China, excluding emissions from fossil fuel burning and cement production, by using two inversions with three new CO2 monitoring stations in China as well as aircraft observations over Asia. We estimate a net terrestrial CO2 uptake of 0.39–0.51 PgC/yr with a mean of 0.45 PgC/yr in 2006–2009. After considering the lateral transport of carbon in air and water and international trade, the annual mean carbon sink is adjusted to 0.35 PgC/yr. To evaluate this top-down estimate, we constructed an independent bottom-up estimate based on ecosystem data, and giving a net land sink of 0.33 PgC/yr. This demonstrates closure between the top-down and bottom-up estimates. Both top-down and bottom-up estimates give a higher carbon sink than previous estimates made for the 1980s and 1990s, suggesting a trend towards increased uptake by land ecosystems in China.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The ChPT: top-down and bottom-up
    Kampf, Karol
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2021, 2021 (12)
  • [32] The ChPT: top-down and bottom-up
    Karol Kampf
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021
  • [33] Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up
    Nisbet, Euan
    Weiss, Ray
    SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5983) : 1241 - 1243
  • [35] Towards photoactive carbon nanomembranes: Facing the challenges of bottom-up and top-down approaches
    Winter, Andreas
    Endres, Patrick
    Kuellmer, Maria
    Neumann, Christof
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [36] Constraining biospheric carbon dioxide fluxes by combined top-down and bottom-up approaches
    Upton, Samuel
    Reichstein, Markus
    Gans, Fabian
    Peters, Wouter
    Kraft, Basil
    Bastos, Ana
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (04) : 2555 - 2582
  • [37] International Climate Negotiations: Top-down, Bottom-up or a Combination of Both?
    Andresen, Steinar
    INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2015, 50 (01): : 15 - 30
  • [38] The top-down nature of ontological inquiry: Against pluralism about top-down and bottom-up approaches
    van der Merwe, Ragnar
    METAPHILOSOPHY, 2025, 56 (01) : 35 - 51
  • [39] HOW STRESS AFFECTS ATTENTION: TOP-DOWN, BOTTOM-UP OR BOTH?
    Larra, Mauro
    von Haugwitz, Leon
    Wascher, Edmund
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 : S66 - S66