Gender and individual differences in cueing effects: Visuospatial attention and object likability

被引:0
|
作者
Takashi Mitsuda
Mio Otani
Sayana Sugimoto
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan University,College of Information Science and Engineering
来源
关键词
Attention; Preference; Gender differences; Cueing; Unconsciousness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An arrow marker appearing in a field of view shifts the observer’s attention in its indicated direction. On the other hand, the gaze of another individual not only shifts the observer’s attention but also increases the likability of objects in the direction of their gaze. These effects occur even when the arrow markers or gaze cues are presented for very short periods so that the observer is unaware of them. To expand on the findings of previous studies, we conducted two experiments. In the first we examined the changes in likability and attentional shift induced by supraliminal and subliminal arrow markers, using 40 male and 40 female participants. We found, contrary to previous findings, that supraliminal arrow markers not only shifted the observers’ attention but slightly increased object likability. On the other hand, subliminal arrow markers only shifted the observers’ attention. The attentional shift was stronger for female than for male participants in the case of supraliminal, but not of subliminal, markers. The second experiment verified the changes in likability induced by supraliminal arrow markers and compared the effects with those of supraliminal gaze cues among 40 female participants. We found that the liking effect was observed for both arrow markers and gaze cues. However, both effects were small, and no significant difference was found between them. Overall, these results show that gender and individual differences have considerable impacts on cueing effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1890 / 1900
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effects of Attention Cueing on Visualizers' Multimedia Learning
    Yang, Hui-Yu
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2016, 19 (01): : 249 - 262
  • [42] Gender differences in visuospatial planning: An eye movements study
    Cazzato, Valentina
    Basso, Demis
    Cutini, Simone
    Bisiacchi, Patrizia
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 206 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [43] Individual Differences in Object Recognition
    Richler, Jennifer J.
    Tomarken, Andrew J.
    Sunday, Mackenzie A.
    Vickery, Timothy J.
    Ryan, Kaitlin F.
    Floyd, R. Jackie
    Sheinberg, David
    Wong, Alan C-N
    Gauthier, Isabel
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 126 (02) : 226 - 251
  • [44] Individual differences in adolescent health symptoms: the effects of gender and coping
    Wilson, GS
    Pritchard, ME
    Revalee, B
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2005, 28 (03) : 369 - 379
  • [45] Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study
    Curran, T
    Hills, A
    Patterson, MB
    Strauss, ME
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2001, 39 (03) : 288 - 301
  • [46] Effects of acute alcohol intoxication on visuospatial attention
    do Canto-Pereira, Luiz Henrique M.
    David, Isabel de P. A.
    Machado-Pinheiro, Walter
    Ranvaud, Ronald D.
    HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2007, 26 (04) : 311 - 319
  • [47] Effects of attention during encoding on sex differences in object location memory
    Barel, Efrat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 54 (04) : 539 - 547
  • [48] Individual differences in proactive interference in verbal and visuospatial working memory
    Lilienthal, Lindsey
    MEMORY, 2017, 25 (08) : 1110 - 1116
  • [49] Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning
    Gozli, Davood G.
    Aslam, Hira
    Pratt, Jay
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (02) : 459 - 467
  • [50] Individual Differences in Visuospatial Working Memory Capacity and Distractor Inhibition
    Lecerf, Thierry
    Roulin, Jean-Luc
    SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 68 (02): : 67 - 78