Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of wine yeasts used for acidic musts

被引:0
|
作者
Alina Kunicka-Styczyńska
Katarzyna Rajkowska
机构
[1] Technical University of Lodz,Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology
关键词
Wine yeasts; Stability; Karyotyping; mtDNA restriction analysis; Malic acid;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the physiological and genetic stability of the industrial wine yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum under acidic stress during fermentation. The yeasts were sub-cultured in aerobic or fermentative conditions in media with or without l-malic acid. Changes in the biochemical profiles, karyotypes, and mitochondrial DNA profiles were assessed after minimum 50 generations. All yeast segregates showed a tendency to increase the range of compounds used as sole carbon sources. The wild strains and their segregates were aneuploidal or diploidal. One of the four strains of S. cerevisiae did not reveal any changes in the electrophoretic profiles of chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA, irrespective of culture conditions. The extent of genomic changes in the other yeasts was strain-dependent. In the karyotypes of the segregates, the loss of up to 2 and the appearance up to 3 bands was noted. The changes in their mtDNA patterns were much broader, reaching 5 missing and 10 additional bands. The only exception was S. bayanus var. uvarum Y.00779, characterized by significantly greater genome plasticity only under fermentative stress. Changes in karyotypes and mtDNA profiles prove that fermentative stress is the main driving force of the adaptive evolution of the yeasts. l-malic acid does not influence the extent of genomic changes and the resistance of wine yeasts exhibiting increased demalication activity to acidic stress is rather related to their ability to decompose this acid. The phenotypic changes in segregates, which were found even in yeasts that did not reveal deviations in their DNA profiles, show that phenotypic characterization may be misleading in wine yeast identification. Because of yeast gross genomic diversity, karyotyping even though it does not seem to be a good discriminative tool, can be useful in determining the stability of wine yeasts. Restriction analysis of mitochondrial DNA appears to be a more sensitive method allowing for an early detection of genotypic changes in yeasts. Thus, if both of these methods are applied, it is possible to conduct the quick routine assessment of wine yeast stability in pure culture collections depositing industrial strains.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1940
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mapping of wine yeast and fungal diversity in the Small Carpathian wine-producing region (Slovakia): evaluation of phenotypic, genotypic and culture-independent approaches
    Katarína Ženišová
    Katarína Chovanová
    Viera Chebeňová-Turcovská
    Zuzana Godálová
    Lucia Kraková
    Tomáš Kuchta
    Domenico Pangallo
    Barbara Brežná
    Annals of Microbiology, 2014, 64 : 1819 - 1828
  • [32] THE GENOTYPIC AND PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITY OF MOSAIC TURNER SYNDROME (TS)
    Avolio, Marissa
    Witchel, Selma F.
    Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2017, 88 : 205 - 206
  • [33] Assessing the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in France
    Leyronas, Christel
    Bardin, Marc
    Berthier, Karine
    Duffaud, Magali
    Troulet, Claire
    Torres, Marie
    Villeneuve, Francois
    Nicot, Philippe C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2018, 152 (04) : 933 - 944
  • [34] Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity of Cherry Species Collected in Serbia
    Barac, G.
    Ognjanov, V.
    Obreht, D.
    Ljubojevic, M.
    Bosnjakovic, D.
    Pejic, I.
    Gasic, K.
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2014, 32 (01) : 92 - 108
  • [35] Mapping of wine yeast and fungal diversity in the Small Carpathian wine-producing region (Slovakia): evaluation of phenotypic, genotypic and culture-independent approaches
    Zenisova, Katarina
    Chovanova, Katarina
    Chebenova-Turcovska, Viera
    Godalova, Zuzana
    Krakova, Lucia
    Kuchta, Tomas
    Pangallo, Domenico
    Brezna, Barbara
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (04) : 1819 - 1828
  • [36] Brettanomyces bruxellensis phenotypic diversity, tolerance to wine stress and wine spoilage ability
    Cibrario, Alice
    Miot-Sertier, Cecile
    Paulin, Margot
    Bullier, Bastien
    Riquier, Laurent
    Perello, Marie-Claire
    de Revel, Gilles
    Albertin, Warren
    Masneuf-Pomarede, Isabelle
    Ballestra, Patricia
    Dols-Lafargue, Marguerite
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 87
  • [37] Tracking Salmonella Contamination in Various Watersheds and Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity
    Patchanee, Prapas
    Molla, Bayleyegn
    White, Nancy
    Line, Daniel E.
    Gebreyes, Wondwossen A.
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2010, 7 (09) : 1113 - 1120
  • [38] Diversity of Lactobacillus sakei strains investigated by phenotypic and genotypic methods
    McLeod, Anette
    Nyquist, O. Ludvig
    Snipen, Lars
    Naterstad, Kristine
    Axelsson, Lars
    SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (05) : 393 - 403
  • [39] Exploring genotypic and phenotypic diversity of microbes using microarray approaches
    Mukherjee, A
    Jackson, SA
    LeClerc, JE
    Cebula, TA
    TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS, 2006, 16 (2-3) : 121 - 128
  • [40] Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Ascochyta fabae Populations in Southern Australia
    Blake, Sara N.
    Lee, Robert C.
    Russ, Michelle H.
    Farquharson, Elizabeth A.
    Rose, Jade A.
    Herdina
    Goonetilleke, Shashi N.
    Farfan-Caceres, Lina M.
    Debler, Johannes W.
    Syme, Robert A.
    Davidson, Jennifer A.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13