Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court

被引:0
|
作者
Kristen N. Jozkowski
Brandon L. Crawford
Ronna C. Turner
Wen-Juo Lo
机构
[1] Indiana University,Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health
[2] Indiana University,The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction
[3] University of Arkansas,Educational Statistics and Research Methods
来源
关键词
Abortion; Public opinion; Abortion knowledge; Abortion sentiments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade. However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning the decision. To account for this, we examined people’s knowledge of and sentiments toward Roe v. Wade using a tiered survey design. First, we assessed participants’ baseline knowledge. Next, we provided information about Roe v. Wade and implications associated with overturning the decision. Finally, we assessed people’s sentiments toward Roe v. Wade. Using quota-based sampling, data were collected from a national sample of English- and Spanish-speaking US adults (N = 2557). Results suggest people are somewhat knowledgeable—they know Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion and they know abortion is currently legal. However, people were less knowledgeable about implications of overturning the decision. Although the majority of our sample supported upholding Roe v. Wade, support was lower compared with previous research. Perhaps being more informed dissuaded some support. We recommend researchers use comprehensive mechanisms to assess complex issues, like Roe v. Wade. We also recommend policy-makers avoid basing important decisions on data from single, simplistic items.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 300
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] "Shouldn't Nobody Make a Woman do What they Don't Want to do with their Body": Black Women's Reactions to the Supreme Court's Overturn of Roe v. Wade
    Coates, Erica E.
    de Heer, Rebecca
    McLeod, Alison
    Porter, Shy C.
    Hoffman, Sarah Barclay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2024, 11 (02) : 968 - 979
  • [42] Executive Branch Socialization and Deference on the U.S. Supreme Court
    Robinson, Rob
    [J]. LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2012, 46 (04) : 889 - 921
  • [43] The U.S. Supreme Court and Special Education: 2005 to 2007
    Yell, Mitchell L.
    Ryan, Joseph B.
    Rozalski, Michael E.
    Katsiyannis, Antonis
    [J]. TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2009, 41 (03) : 68 - 75
  • [44] Landfill siting case reaches U.S. Supreme Court
    [J]. Waste Age, 2000, 31 (12):
  • [45] Constitutional Law-Making in the U.S. Supreme Court
    Makhambetsaliyev, Dauren B.
    Sagynbekova, Gulnar M.
    Abdykadyr, Ulan B.
    Alimova, Elvira A.
    Smanova, Akmaral B.
    [J]. PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2024, 26 (04) : 473 - 484
  • [46] Coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: 1969–2009
    Steven J. Brams
    Gustavo Camilo
    Alexandra D. Franz
    [J]. Public Choice, 2014, 158 : 525 - 539
  • [47] Keeping the faith: A cultural history of the U.S. Supreme Court
    Ely, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY, 2000, 66 (01) : 115 - 116
  • [48] U.S. Supreme Court to decide on specifics of title VII
    Miller, Shane
    [J]. Iron and Steel Technology, 2019, 16 (10): : 73 - 74
  • [49] Justices and Journalists: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Media.
    Pacelle, Richard L., Jr.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2012, 10 (02) : 498 - 499